except ron paul, most of them are not philosophy based.

來源: moneyIterator 2012-09-06 10:49:00 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (135 bytes)

Looking at wall street influence to both Bush, Clinton, and Obama. They are just philosophy based during election year campaign.

所有跟帖: 

But Ron Paul would never be elected....:(( -pinkdreams- 給 pinkdreams 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/06/2012 postreply 10:53:46

Agree.若RON PAUL 能成為候選人, 我絕對選他. 可惜啊.所以希望再給08四年約束牆街.不好意思,阿粉和W總. -999朵玫瑰- 給 999朵玫瑰 發送悄悄話 999朵玫瑰 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 09/06/2012 postreply 10:56:01

Doubt Obama can rein in wall st, but sure he is better than Romn -moneyIterator- 給 moneyIterator 發送悄悄話 moneyIterator 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 09/06/2012 postreply 19:00:21

Paul Ryan is very much ideologically inflexible -野生動物攝影家- 給 野生動物攝影家 發送悄悄話 野生動物攝影家 的博客首頁 (120 bytes) () 09/06/2012 postreply 11:10:13

Yeah "ideologically based" is the correct word, I used a wrong w -moneyIterator- 給 moneyIterator 發送悄悄話 moneyIterator 的博客首頁 (61 bytes) () 09/06/2012 postreply 19:29:00

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”