Presidential War Powers隻在3種情況下可以用:

1.已經宣戰的
2.有過特別授權的,比如: UN授權的
3.在美國受到攻擊時


“The War Powers Resolution of 1973 gives the president the power to commit troops anywhere he likes for 90 days.”

The War Powers Resolution is incoherent. Section 2(c) provides that the president’s power to initiate military action is limited to “(1) a declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization, or (3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.” But at the same time, it authorizes the president to introduce military force for up to 90 days for any reason at all, which is obviously unconstitutional. I’ve written on this elsewhere.

所有跟帖： 

• 暈，差點被讀《海軍報》的忽悠了，這種信息不能信讀《海軍報》的，太無厘頭了。 -低頭的穀穗11- ♂ (6 bytes) () 12/11/2014 postreply 07:47:58

• 金兄，你瞎沉潛什麽？ 你不在居然還有人講老蔣會打仗，要笑掉大牙啊：)) -FL棉農- ♂ (0 bytes) () 12/11/2014 postreply 07:53:57

• 這個”瞎沉潛“是膠東土話吧？意思是”瞎嘀咕“？依稀記得是”瞎沉沉“。 -低頭的穀穗11- ♂ (0 bytes) () 12/11/2014 postreply 08:00:33

• 前兩天，金兄冒了一頭，又沒了，NND。知道他跑那裏去了？ -FL棉農- ♂ (0 bytes) () 12/11/2014 postreply 08:03:11

• 1973年美國國會強行通過《戰爭權力決議案》，規定美國政府在獲國會授權時、緊急情況或照會國會後60-90天無授權期間中使用軍隊“ -FL棉農- ♂ (243 bytes) () 12/11/2014 postreply 07:52:25

• 國會隻有對外宣戰權，無指揮權。而美總統是三軍總司令，他有權調動軍隊，這也就 是我們今天要討論的題目 -FL棉農- ♂ (0 bytes) () 12/11/2014 postreply 07:58:35

• 你忽略了authorization.這個東西說明權力的出處和來源 -留學美國- ♂ (140 bytes) () 12/11/2014 postreply 08:01:57

• 90天以後需要authorization -FL棉農- ♂ (0 bytes) () 12/11/2014 postreply 08:04:11

• “The War Powers Resolution of 1973 gives the president the power -FL棉農- ♂ (0 bytes) () 12/11/2014 postreply 08:04:50

• Presidential War Powers隻是一種應急的解決方式,隻在3種情況下可以用 -留學美國- ♂ (77 bytes) () 12/11/2014 postreply 08:17:36

• 軍人隻向總統，國家表忠心。換一個總統(哪怕不同政黨)上來一樣。 -FL棉農- ♂ (0 bytes) () 12/11/2014 postreply 08:26:39