可能我的理解有誤,不適應檸檬法,但有類似的法律法規。這是他們的解釋

來源: Beehoney 2022-01-27 15:38:00 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (1037 bytes)

I got the approval to open your claim.  I do want to reiterate that due to the statute of limitations for the XXX state Lemon Law, we will be suing the Federal Magnuson Moss Warranty Act.  Our goal is to recover significant compensation for you to reflect the diminished value of the vehicle as a result of the problems, even if and when the car is fixed.  This money will not impair nor impact the resale or trade in value of the vehicle, nor will it affect the warranty.  You will not need to disclose that you received this money at the time of the trade or sale.  Like the lemon law, the legal representation is completely free to you with the manufacturer paying all attorney fees on top of recourse, which is, mandatory as part of any settlement.  To expedite the process of your claim, feel free to email your documents to

所有跟帖: 

不是打檸檬官司而是打warranty官司 -MoonRiverMe- 給 MoonRiverMe 發送悄悄話 MoonRiverMe 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 01/27/2022 postreply 15:51:47

英文和法律我都不太懂,你清楚並保護好自己就好了,那,最終的”缺陷”問題是怎麽界定或確定的呢? -Oneshotkill- 給 Oneshotkill 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 01/27/2022 postreply 15:55:58

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”