Pricier, heavier vehicles are safer, national study by UB conclu

Pricier, heavier vehicles are safer, national study by UB concludes

 
 
 

You get what you pay for in cars if safety is your major concern.

That’s the conclusion of a University at Buffalo study presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine in San Diego.

The researchers conducted a retrospective study of 360 vehicle models from 2010 to 2012 based on insurance losses tracked by the Highway Loss Data Institute, a nonprofit organization funded by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.

The result: Very large pickup trucks and sport utility vehicles – which are heavier and pricier than others – had the lowest frequency of personal-injury claims.

Advertisement

Vehicles with the best scores included:

Dodge Ram 2500 mega cab, GMC Sierra 1500, Ford F-150, GMC Sierra 2500 crew cab, Land Rover Range Rover, Chevrolet Silverado 2500 crew cab, Land Rover LR4, Ford F-250 supercab and Volvo XC60.

Also, Porsche Cayenne, Audi A6 four-door, Mini Cooper Countryman, Toyota Tacoma Xtra, Chevrolet Silverado 1500, Cadillac Escalade ESV, Ford F-150 supercab and Ford F-350 crew cab.

All of those are four-wheel drive except for the Porsche, Mini Cooper and Volvo.

Vehicles with the highest frequency of personal-injury claims and, as a result, deemed the least safe, were:

Suzuki SX4, Mitsubishi Galant, Dodge Avenger, Kia Forte, Nissan Versa, Hyundai Accent, Mitsubishi Lancer, Nissan Sentra, Dodge Caliber, Suzuki Grand Vitara four-wheel drive and Scion tC.

Also, Toyota Corolla, Nissan Versa hatchback, Dodge Charger, Nissan Altima two- and four-door, Chrysler 200, Nissan Rogue, Honda Accord two-door, Honda Civic two-door, Kia Forte two-door, Chevrolet Impala and Ford Fiesta.

“The most important point of our study is that vehicle weight and price have a positive relationship with vehicle safety,” said Dr. Dietrich V. Jehle, professor of emergency medicine in the UB School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, who presented the research May 14.

“We found that vehicle type, curb weight and price are all significant predictors of personal-injury cost,” he said.

“For every additional $10,000 you spend, injuries go down by almost 12 percent. We also found that for every 1,000-pound increase in weight, vehicles were 19 percent safer.”

The UB researchers used a different method to evaluate safety than the standard industry ratings. That is why the study’s findings rank some of America’s most popular cars, such as the Honda Accord and Civic and the Toyota Corolla, in the “least safe” category, the researchers said.

Jehle, who also is a physician at Erie County Medical Center, said the five-star crash ratings reported by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration are based on results from crash tests that may be technically accurate but may not completely reflect what happens in real-world crashes with multiple cars.

“When smaller cars hit a larger, moving vehicle, that change in velocity can force the smaller car to go into reverse, resulting in far more serious injuries to driver and passenger,” he said.

Jehle and his colleagues instead used frequency of personal-injury claims as an indicator of vehicle safety in the 17 states that have no-fault insurance.

The personal-injury claim data also have limitations. For instance, the findings do not account for miles driven per vehicle. As such, the study excluded sports cars, which tend to be driven less than other cars.

email: hdavis@buffnews.com

所有跟帖: 

You get what you pay for in cars if safety is your major concern -修車工- 給 修車工 發送悄悄話 修車工 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/09/2017 postreply 21:38:10

not everyone understands this -老生長談- 給 老生長談 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/09/2017 postreply 21:43:36

+1,the physical ruler they studied in high school. -US_CAR.- 給 US_CAR. 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/10/2017 postreply 07:53:07

請問樓上三位你們自身經曆過嚴重車禍嗎? -fourwaves- 給 fourwaves 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/10/2017 postreply 09:36:34

從來沒有,隻是在停車場讓人碰後Bumper -soccer88- 給 soccer88 發送悄悄話 soccer88 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/10/2017 postreply 09:52:52

你是四樓 -fourwaves- 給 fourwaves 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/10/2017 postreply 10:18:22

我有過 -老生長談- 給 老生長談 發送悄悄話 (403 bytes) () 03/10/2017 postreply 13:13:19

為啥開大奔 -soccer88- 給 soccer88 發送悄悄話 soccer88 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/10/2017 postreply 13:48:30

好好好,我承認我的罪過。。。哈哈 -老生長談- 給 老生長談 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/10/2017 postreply 14:46:55

一樓三樓呢? -fourwaves- 給 fourwaves 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/10/2017 postreply 15:57:55

有啊,老款的Taurus把碗口大樹兩棵樹攔腰掃斷,車架完好,車廢了人沒事。如果是易拉罐的話,那就是人和車都沒了,樹還在。 -US_CAR.- 給 US_CAR. 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/10/2017 postreply 23:01:16

跟電影似的,要你賠樹嗎? -soccer88- 給 soccer88 發送悄悄話 soccer88 的博客首頁 (169 bytes) () 03/11/2017 postreply 11:02:13

當然賠啊,是私人領地。由保險公司賠。 -US_CAR.- 給 US_CAR. 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/11/2017 postreply 20:29:28

這就對了,保險公司就是要你買貴的車,他們可以多賺錢。重心高的車易翻車是物理定律。 -萬得福- 給 萬得福 發送悄悄話 萬得福 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/10/2017 postreply 05:53:24

保險費和車價之間沒有線性關係。 -hello2002- 給 hello2002 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/10/2017 postreply 07:42:31

肯定是貴車保費比小車多很多。雙保就更厲害了。 -needtime- 給 needtime 發送悄悄話 needtime 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/10/2017 postreply 07:48:39

俺兩輛volvo雙保一個月100塊。保險賠了好幾回了。有別人撞的,也有自己撞的。 -hello2002- 給 hello2002 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/10/2017 postreply 07:52:10

這100塊裏還包括租車和roadside assistance -hello2002- 給 hello2002 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/10/2017 postreply 07:54:37

deductible 是50還是100, 所以自己過錯時修車就隻付那點。 -hello2002- 給 hello2002 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/10/2017 postreply 08:00:33

這能說明什麽?volvo即不貴也不算重。 -prestolite- 給 prestolite 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/10/2017 postreply 08:10:14

兩車價一個比另一個貴60%,保險費幾乎一樣。 -hello2002- 給 hello2002 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/10/2017 postreply 08:22:04

你那賣的人品不錯,該多給他拉點客,我的21ct老讓我做雷鋒 -chinomango- 給 chinomango 發送悄悄話 chinomango 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/10/2017 postreply 14:59:22

我這裏volo比豐田,鬆田貴些, 比lexus便宜點,和honda/Acura同等 -needtime- 給 needtime 發送悄悄話 needtime 的博客首頁 (59 bytes) () 03/11/2017 postreply 03:38:06

歐洲? -soccer88- 給 soccer88 發送悄悄話 soccer88 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/11/2017 postreply 11:02:55

現在變成3田了 -老生長談- 給 老生長談 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/11/2017 postreply 12:19:32

這是你的imagination -蔥蒜- 給 蔥蒜 發送悄悄話 蔥蒜 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/10/2017 postreply 09:49:44

利益集團通過主流媒體給大眾洗腦。這叫宣傳。 -萬得福- 給 萬得福 發送悄悄話 萬得福 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/10/2017 postreply 05:56:15

那推XX車就不是利益集團了? -修車工- 給 修車工 發送悄悄話 修車工 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/10/2017 postreply 10:24:11

大車比較安全,但也有容易出事故和停車難的問題(大尺寸) -覓音- 給 覓音 發送悄悄話 覓音 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/10/2017 postreply 09:20:41

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!