從來沒這麽嚴重過。但自從有了鋁門,就出現了,看來還是和雙金屬有關。讀這段:

來源: 史迷 2014-10-12 13:14:09 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (1464 bytes)
A class action lawsuit filed in the United States District Court in New Jersey claims that Ford used aluminum hoods but failed to properly insulate them from "old iron-based connecting and supporting parts," despite knowing that "would give rise to galvanic coupling" and corrosion.[1]

It goes on to say that the automaker went on to conceal this inevitable problem from buyers, drastically reducing the long-term value of their vehicles.

Ford not only denies this claim, but says the suit is so lacking in merit that it should be dismissed. Last fall, Judge Kevin McNulty granted only part of Ford's request, dismissing one of three counts, allowing the case to continue.[1]

How Much Did Ford Know About the Problem?

Ford can deny concealing the problem until the cows come home, but actions speak louder than words. In 2004 the manufacturer sent dealers a technical service bulletin (TSB) about bubbling and blistering under the paint on aluminum body panels due to "iron contamination of the aluminum panel".

The TSB goes on to say that "testing has revealed that the aluminum corrosion was caused by iron particles working their way into the aluminum body part, prior to it being painted."

Hey Ford, what was that about not knowing this was an issue?

事出有因,查有沒有實據,還不敢斷言:)

所有跟帖: 

還是噴漆不過關 -biglow- 給 biglow 發送悄悄話 biglow 的博客首頁 (87 bytes) () 10/12/2014 postreply 16:48:30

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”