XC60 Side is not as good as Q5

來源: mm196666 2014-01-01 17:25:31 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (2771 bytes)

XC60 Side and Moderate overlap front is not as good as Q5

B-pillar to longitudinal centerline of driver's seat (cm)

XC60:
-22.0
Q5: -23.0
RX: -17

source:
http://www.iihs.org/iihs/ratings/vehicle/v/audi/q5
http://www.iihs.org/iihs/ratings/vehicle/v/volvo/xc60


Moderate overlap front crash test.
 
Footwell intrusion  
  XC60 Q5
Footrest (cm) 3 2
Left (cm) 4 3
Center (cm) 4 3
Right (cm) 7 4
Brake pedal (cm) 3 6
Instrument panel rearward movement
Left (cm) 1 -1
Right (cm) 1 0



Q5's controllability with full time 4wd can reduce a lot possibility of accidents that occures on other cars.

Driving XC60 feels more like driving RX350. After you drive Q5 for a few hours, you won't even think about a japanese car. Almost everything is smooth and effortless. Try to compare Q5's high speed turns vs part time 4wd MDX, X3, GLK, XC60 on dry pavement. You will see the difference.


請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”