你要是一而再，再而三的玩這種把戲就沒意思了

同樣，下麵是原文鏈接：

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/02/08/AR2011020800540.html?sid=ST2011021106912

你給的這篇摘要又是說一半話，而且，把不該加上的加上了。

1. WP的原文壓根就沒提San Diego警察事件，而這篇摘要第一句就加上了，給人的感覺是Toy根本就是無辜的。而事實上，我發的上一篇WSJ的文章已經說了，那是一起確定了的事件，而且是Toy設計引起。

2. WP同時說了這篇報告隻分析了9輛車。

Clarence Ditlow, head of the Center for Auto Safety, was also critical of the report from the Transportation Department.

"Their report points out that only one in 100,000 cars have had unintended acceleration, but then they tested only nine vehicles," he said. As a result, he said, the odds of the scientists finding a vehicle with the problem were very slim.

我的結論是你必須鼓吹Toy，為Toy辯護，至於是否是事實是毫不在乎的。你是賣豐田車的嗎？

所有跟帖： 

• 這家夥真不要臉，又來發廣告。 -老黃牛888- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/29/2013 postreply 14:32:38