原來本田也一直很少用高強度鋼,豐田仍然不堪一擊

來源: rockter 2012-12-21 04:36:30 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (4903 bytes)
本文內容已被 [ rockter ] 在 2012-12-21 10:01:39 編輯過。如有問題,請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.

新碰撞出台,臨時抱佛腳。本田用了點高強度鋼過了考試。

豐田不是說新款用了高強度鋼了麽,看來以前根本沒有用,現在用的也不多。

Jetta換型後增大尺寸不增重量,考試不合格,拜托請不要向日係學習。

 

http://www.latimes.com/business/autos/la-fi-hy-crash-test-fail-camry-prius-v-20121219,0,7407803.story

Two key Toyota models, the flagship Camry sedan and the Prius v wagon, failed an important new crash test conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, an insurance industry group.

Honda's newly redesigned Accord tied for the top safety rating with the Suzuki Kizashi, a car that will soon no longer be sold in the United States. The redesigned Ford Fusion also scored well.

The results raise concerns that the Toyota models can't provide protection from serious injuries in common accidents. The automaker's new Prius v, a wagon version of the popular hybrid, scored last among 18 cars tested, with "poor" ratings in five of seven categories. The Camry -- America's bestselling passenger car -- scored next to last.

"Toyota engineers have a lot of work to do to match the performance of their competitors," said Adrian Lund, the insurance group's president.

 PHOTOS: Popular cars' crash test ratings

Toyota, in a statement, vowed to focus on improving safety.

"With this new test, the institute has raised the bar again, and we will respond to the challenge," the automaker said.

Toyota said the Camry and Prius v have performed well on other tests and are still rated as "Top Safety Picks" by the organization.

The new test -- in which 25% of a car's front end on the driver's side strikes a 5-foot-tall rigid barrier at 40 mph -- simulates a wreck in which the front corner of the car hits another car or a solid object. This was the first test of family cars and follows a similar test this year in which only three of 11 luxury cars scored well.

The front corner crashes can be particularly severe. "The crash damage in these tests is like the damage we see in real-world crashes where heads and chests are injured," Lund said.

The trade group said some automakers, including Honda, Ford and Nissan, are starting to redesign vehicles to protect passengers in front-corner impacts, and that's one of the reasons the family cars fared better than luxury cars.

But Toyota has work to do. The institute found multiple intrusions, including the front driver's-side wheel, of various components into the passenger cabins of both vehicles.

"The Camry's driver airbag and side curtain airbag deployed, but the steering wheel moved so far to the right that the dummy's head made only minimal contact with the front airbag. The side curtain airbag didn't extend far enough forward to help prevent the dummy's head from hitting the instrument panel," the institute said in its report. "In the Prius v, the side curtain airbag deployed too late in the crash to offer protection."

The Accord, by contrast, earned "good" ratings in five out of six categories in the test and overall. In the test, the Accord's safety belts and airbags worked together to provide protection, the institute said.

The car's structure held up better, enabling the driver airbag to cushion the dummy's head and chest. The side curtain airbag extended far enough forward to prevent the dummy's head from hitting interior components, the institute said.

Honda added high-strength steel to the Accord to prevent cabin intrusion in such crashes, said Chuck Thomas, the automaker's chief engineer for automotive safety research. It also designed the car to more quickly absorb forces to improve passenger safety, he said.

The institute first started publishing data on these kinds of crashes in 2009, giving Honda time to research the issue and make improvements to the Accord, he said.

"Safety is something that customers think about particularly in buying vehicles in the mid-size sedan segment," Thomas said. "These are cars that families use and drive every day."

Consumers should take note of safety tests conducted by the organization, said Jake Fisher, automotive test director for Consumer Reports. Consumer Reports will withhold a recommendation if a vehicle performs poorly in some of the older, key tests performed by the organization.

"Over time, their tests have become more stringent than the government tests, and they tend to push further," Fisher said. "That keeps the manufacturers building safer cars."

所有跟帖: 

我以前買車到過lexus,accura,MB,BMW的地雷處對各車身的前輪上方車皮用手掌壓按。。。 -不得不說no- 給 不得不說no 發送悄悄話 (77 bytes) () 12/21/2012 postreply 07:16:38

俺前不久剛反映過這個事實,但是日車粉仍然砸俺很多磚頭。。。 -wsjzx- 給 wsjzx 發送悄悄話 wsjzx 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 12/21/2012 postreply 09:52:47

不用怕,你一個手指頭就能把它們捏癟了 -大眼賊- 給 大眼賊 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 12/21/2012 postreply 09:56:40

記得以前國內車展,FIT (飛度)明確地標出“不準用手按壓” -coolwin- 給 coolwin 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 12/21/2012 postreply 11:55:26

我不明白這能說明什麽? -nj_guy- 給 nj_guy 發送悄悄話 nj_guy 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 12/23/2012 postreply 16:24:08

狹路相逢,勇者勝,豐田車犧牲自己去換別人生路,精神可嘉…… -linw- 給 linw 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 12/21/2012 postreply 08:47:22

是的,軟鋼吸能效果更好,更好保護對方。是毫不利己專門利人的精神。 -US_CAR.- 給 US_CAR. 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 12/21/2012 postreply 12:14:24

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”