Not really. If you assume complete inelastic collision,

來源: 周老大 2012-02-14 18:32:57 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (852 bytes)
回答: 第二點太搞了。RedCedar2012-02-14 16:07:14

it does not matter who's faster. Only the Civic would be forced back if F150 was also fast. The energy needed to be absorbed is proportional to squre of relative speed, which is mostly taken by Civic. You can try your high school physics on this.

It's like someone hit your body with his fist, according to Newton, the forces on each other are the same, only difference is the fist can handle it better.

Think it this way, if Civic was sitting still while F150 was hitting it at 70 miles/hour, do you think Civic would just be fine?

Does that matter it's egg hit stone or stone hit egg?

The problem is Civic bumper was useless when it's hit by a higher F150.

When we bought our Pilot we were looking for a van with higher bumper, and that's the only thing available at that time to my knowledge.

所有跟帖: 

Also, if you assume complete inelastic collision, -周老大- 給 周老大 發送悄悄話 周老大 的博客首頁 (191 bytes) () 02/15/2012 postreply 08:39:42

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”