Most of pro review say Forest is better, but CR-V is more popula

來源: playForever 2011-05-28 20:59:59 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (691 bytes)
回答: Forester is much better.Dream_Maker2011-05-28 19:25:41

Most of reviews from PRO magazines say that Forest is better. Subaru is better than CR-V in most of aspects(size, performance, and even handling), except Honda name is more popular. Forest is also a popularone (the most popular model among all Subarus). Since most of CR-V parts are shared with Civic(some may be Accord), the availability of parts is higher(more 3rd parties and OEM will make Honda parts). This makes the repair cost lower when the vehicle is old, and resale value is higher(because lower cost to repair).

If you are going to keep the vehicle for a while(8-10 years), I would say go with Forest. CR-V is just too under powered.

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”