回複:SUV bumper 太高與小Ü囅嘧玻?

來源: tsc12 2010-12-02 11:16:10 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (4745 bytes)

Though there are rules in place to ensure that bumpers on cars from different brands line up with each other, there are no such restrictions on SUVs, resulting in costly repair bills when collisions occur, according to a new study.

The U.S. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety released a report Thursday after performing crash tests to measure the impact of the mismatched bumper heights.

"Bumpers are supposed to bump and engage each other in crashes to prevent costly damage to the parts of the vehicle that are expensive to repair," Russ Rader, of the IIHS, told CTV's Canada AM.

"And because of lax regulations, cars and SUVs share the road but they don't share the same bumper rules."

While cars are required to have bumpers that protect a zone from 16 to 20 inches off the ground, SUVs, along with pick-up trucks and minivans, have no such requirement.

The result is that when cars crash into each other, the bumpers usually line up. But when the crash involves a car and an SUV, the bumpers are likely to miss each other and cause much more damage.

The IIHS tested SUVs and cars travelling 16 kilometres per hour in front-into-rear collisions involving seven pairs of 2010-2011 models. Each pair included a small car and SUV from the same automaker.

"We picked vehicles from the same manufacturer because we think automakers should at the least pay attention to bumper compatibility across their own fleets," explained Joe Nolan, the Institute's chief administrative officer in a release.

"The results show that many don't."

When the Nissan Rogue SUV crashed into the back of the Nissan Sentra, the Rogue's higher bumper overrode the Sentra's. The damage was significant, with a US$7,444 combined repair bill -- and the Rogue was rendered inoperable.

When the Ford Escape was hit from behind by the Ford Focus, the Focus's bumper passed directly under the Escape's, resulting in $5,203 in damage to the car and $2,208 for the SUV.

When the order was reversed and the Escape hit the Focus from behind, the result was similar. In that case the bumpers did overlap slightly, but by a margin of less than two inches -- not enough to absorb the impact. As a result the Focus' rear body and trunk lid received $3,386 in damages from the crash.

There was also significant damage when the Toyota RAV4 and Corolla were paired up. But it wasn't due to the fact the bumpers didn't line up, but the fact the RAV4's rear bumper is little more than a "stamped piece of sheet metal supporting the bumper cover" -- another result of lax bumper regulations.

The Corolla hit the RAV4 from behind, and because the bumper didn't absorb the impact properly, the car hit the spare tire mounted on the RAV4's tailgate. As a result the car's hood, grill, headlights, air conditioner and radiator were damaged, and the RAV4's tailgate and rear body panels were damaged.

The result was almost $10,000 in combined damages.

The results of the Honda tests were among the best, with the CR-V and Civic bumpers lining up better that most other pairs. Half of the bumper face on the Hondas overlapped with each other.

"The CR-V's front bumper overlapped the Civic's rear bumper by more than 2 inches. That may not sound like much, but it's enough to allow the bumpers to do what they're supposed to do," Nolan says.

The combined crash damage between the two Hondas was $2,995 -- the lowest in the test group. The damage to the Civic was just $1,274.

But even among the best performers, the results were still not exceptional, the IIHS said, suggesting that better regulations are urgently required.

"Of the seven car-SUV pairs we tested, we can't point to a single one as a model of compatibility because combined damage estimates run into thousands of dollars for even the best performers," Nolan said.

"In the real world that money comes straight out of consumers' wallets through deductibles and insurance premiums. Regulating SUV bumpers would ease the burden."

Following are some of the most dramatic results from the study:

Toyota Corolla into Toyota Rav4:

  • SUV damage: $6,015
  • Car damage: $3,852

Nissan Rogue into Nissan Sentra:

  • SUV damage: $2,884
  • Car damage: $4,560

Jeep Patriot into Dodge Caliber:

  • SUV damage: $1,415
  • Car damage: $3,095

VW Golf into VW Tiguan:

  • SUV damage: $1,872
  • Car damage: $4,555

所有跟帖: 

Toyota is different. Can someone explain the result -nonego- 給 nonego 發送悄悄話 nonego 的博客首頁 (157 bytes) () 12/02/2010 postreply 12:26:25

That is because... -Dream_Maker- 給 Dream_Maker 發送悄悄話 (114 bytes) () 12/02/2010 postreply 12:33:43

回複:Toyota is different. Can someone explain the result -tsc12- 給 tsc12 發送悄悄話 (21 bytes) () 12/02/2010 postreply 15:09:22

SUV bumper 降低會犧牲其clearance參數,規範化公平化的阻力會很大。 -00zz7788- 給 00zz7788 發送悄悄話 (57 bytes) () 12/02/2010 postreply 18:58:20

SUV 是要下路的. 這就是最好的理由. -周老大- 給 周老大 發送悄悄話 周老大 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 12/02/2010 postreply 21:41:11

如果沒理解錯,老大說的“下路”是指SUV的off-road feature, -00zz7788- 給 00zz7788 發送悄悄話 (37 bytes) () 12/02/2010 postreply 22:35:37

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”