Good.

來源: 滿地找牙 2010-07-28 13:27:41 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (454 bytes)
Your Venture is also 21.7mpg, and it's 3.4L, less than Pilot 3.5L. So I think Pilot is better than Venture.

Newer cars have a lot of electronic stuff than older ones. That will eat up a lot of your mpg.I think.

Consider this, new Pilot engine is better than Venture, even with a higher exhaust and heavier electronic load.Coz normally, among the same type of engines, higher exhaust has lower mpg.

I think. Don't trust me. haha ...

所有跟帖: 

回複:Good. -Kaolin007- 給 Kaolin007 發送悄悄話 Kaolin007 的博客首頁 (123 bytes) () 07/28/2010 postreply 13:46:28

Venture 3360磅,Pilot 4500磅 -nasastar- 給 nasastar 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 07/28/2010 postreply 14:05:32

哈哈,這是關鍵.胖子瘦子跑一樣遠,說明胖子心髒更強 -滿地找牙- 給 滿地找牙 發送悄悄話 滿地找牙 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 07/28/2010 postreply 14:11:28

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”