美國法律是無罪推定，舉證責任在控告方，他不可能僅根據你的車型號，牌照號就打贏官司。那樣的話我隨便在大街上找輛車把這些記下來就可以告任何人了。他必須提供其他證明。如果他沒有任何其他證明，你不用提供任何證明就贏了。如果他有其他證明，你隻需要證明他的證明是假的就可以了。你最好的證明就是你不在現場的證明，如果你能想起來你那天那個時間在幹什麽，並有證人或證據，你肯定沒事。
我給你COPY份網上一個律師對費城TRAFFIC COURT的COMMENT.
2009-11-06 17:50:50: A terrible court. A complete violation of due process rights. You have to prove a defendant committed a traffic violation. The judge cannot simply read ticket and say guilty. I am an attorney who was recently in traffic court and was very upset to see how so many individuals due process rights are violated. You have to prove speeding, show devices were approved by the department of transportation, that devices were tested and validated, etc. This court did not want or due any of this. I surely hope someone looks into this process.
另外我的律師也說十有八九會輸, 隻能走上訴一條路.
法律谘詢版的老貓也研究個那7個法官的判決習慣,同樣說我的案子勝算很小.
在很多地方, 隻要開TICKET的警察不出庭, 被告就贏. 但費城不行. 照輸不誤. 別的很多地方是ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY來起訴, 費城是警察是指控人.然後法官就SIMPLY SAY GUILTY. 我在MITBBS費城版也發了貼統計大家有人或是知道別人贏過交通案件嗎. 沒一個人說贏過. 隻有一個人回貼說法庭就是掙你錢的. 最好的情況是WAIVE掉你的POINT, 但你的錢還是STAY.
我給你COPY份網上一個律師對費城TRAFFIC COURT的COMMENT.
2009-11-06 17:50:50: A terrible court. A complete violation of due process rights. You have to prove a defendant committed a traffic violation. The judge cannot simply read ticket and say guilty. I am an attorney who was recently in traffic court and was very upset to see how so many individuals due process rights are violated. You have to prove speeding, show devices were approved by the department of transportation, that devices were tested and validated, etc. This court did not want or due any of this. I surely hope someone looks into this process.
另外我的律師也說十有八九會輸, 隻能走上訴一條路.
法律谘詢版的老貓也研究個那7個法官的判決習慣,同樣說我的案子勝算很小.
在很多地方, 隻要開TICKET的警察不出庭, 被告就贏. 但費城不行. 照輸不誤. 別的很多地方是ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY來起訴, 費城是警察是指控人.然後法官就SIMPLY SAY GUILTY. 我在MITBBS費城版也發了貼統計大家有人或是知道別人贏過交通案件嗎. 沒一個人說贏過. 隻有一個人回貼說法庭就是掙你錢的. 最好的情況是WAIVE掉你的POINT, 但你的錢還是STAY.
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”
