2001 Lexus RX300, 105574 Miles, $9295. Or Lexus 2003 ES300
所有跟帖:
•
i pick es300. but both are used car. reliability is not sure.
-用戶名被占用了-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
05/24/2010 postreply
09:57:28
•
Which car is more reliable?
-玉樹臨風_-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
05/24/2010 postreply
09:57:51
•
they are used cars. reliability is unknown.
-用戶名被占用了-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
05/24/2010 postreply
10:10:34
•
九年的車還要九千二。還不如再花一萬買camry。反正這二位
-jin_yin_hua-
♂
(17 bytes)
()
05/24/2010 postreply
10:25:15
•
agree, used car 3 years old is the best because
-playForever-
♂
(299 bytes)
()
05/24/2010 postreply
10:45:32
•
plus 2-3 year old luxury cars are still under warranty.
-playForever-
♂
(92 bytes)
()
05/24/2010 postreply
10:48:17
•
do not buy Lexus RX300, it's the worst car in my life so far.
-nonego-
♂
(287 bytes)
()
05/24/2010 postreply
11:37:38
•
9歲的日本車,10萬以裏,6000-7000還可,再多就不值了。
-^3.1415926^-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
05/24/2010 postreply
12:21:45
•
Possible another 100k miles to drive. Why not worth?
-玉樹臨風_-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
05/24/2010 postreply
12:47:20
•
你去dealer轉一圈就知道9歲的車他們給你多少錢,然後,就知道值不值了。
-^3.1415926^-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
05/24/2010 postreply
19:49:13
•
我是說trade in....
-^3.1415926^-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
05/24/2010 postreply
19:50:07
•
建議不要買。圖什麽呢?可靠性
-心字頭上一把刀-
♂
(519 bytes)
()
05/24/2010 postreply
14:06:53
•
名字取得不好,臨風也就算了,還帶下劃線
-piani-
♂
(37 bytes)
()
05/24/2010 postreply
20:12:11