How about this?

回答: 我明白了. I 服了U!!!You are smart.iammadaboutu2010-03-01 19:52:20

一百萬highlander卷入事故的可能有一千,那麽死了10個人,死亡率是百分之一。
一百萬blazer卷入事故的可能有2萬,那麽死了200個人,死亡率依然是百分之一。

Let's assume the above condition, this means to me that:
highlander may have a better maneuverability than blazer to avoid trouble. And this should be considered
when comparing safety score between cars.

Just propose a extreme case:
A heavy tank style car with zero maneuverability is more dangerous than a nimble mini-cooper

Of course, if you only consider the damage after crash,
you have your point. But my humble opinion is that
safety score should consider both the structure strength and manueverability


maneuverability may be


所有跟帖: 

回複:How about this? -iammadaboutu- 給 iammadaboutu 發送悄悄話 iammadaboutu 的博客首頁 (240 bytes) () 03/02/2010 postreply 06:38:58

easy, easy, I love healthy debate -wolfmanii- 給 wolfmanii 發送悄悄話 wolfmanii 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/02/2010 postreply 06:42:48

toyota是可靠的車,這是有口碑的,但不是安全的。 -殺雨- 給 殺雨 發送悄悄話 殺雨 的博客首頁 (445 bytes) () 03/02/2010 postreply 07:58:24

嚴嚴實實,中規中矩 is the mainstream -wolfmanii- 給 wolfmanii 發送悄悄話 wolfmanii 的博客首頁 (568 bytes) () 03/02/2010 postreply 12:27:30

Let's make joke on each other, just for fun :) -wolfmanii- 給 wolfmanii 發送悄悄話 wolfmanii 的博客首頁 (437 bytes) () 03/02/2010 postreply 12:34:27

懦弱的性能和車身, depends on which model you are comparing with -wolfmanii- 給 wolfmanii 發送悄悄話 wolfmanii 的博客首頁 (88 bytes) () 03/02/2010 postreply 12:35:51

豐田懦弱的性能和車身? -wolfmanii- 給 wolfmanii 發送悄悄話 wolfmanii 的博客首頁 (72 bytes) () 03/02/2010 postreply 12:37:23

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!