http://autos.yahoo.com/2010_chevrolet_malibu_ls-review_user/?reviewId=15
2010 Malibu is a Great buy!
by Anthony
on 12/23/2009
* Overall 5 stars
* Appearance 5 stars
* Comfort 3 stars
* Performance 3 stars
* Value 5 stars
* Reliability 3 stars
Pros
Xm radio/Onstar comes standard, New Design, Great MPG.
Cons
Small Trunk, Poor cornering, noisy cabin.
Purchased As New
I bought my 2010 malibu new and I've had it about two months now. I love this car. The look of it is just amazing, the exterior alone has turned a few heads during my travels. The interier design is very sleek and stream lined giving the Malibu a more expensive look. The XM radio and Onstar come standard. Both free for a limited time, 90 days of XM, 12 Months of Onstar. My friends are very impressed with the Onstar turn by turn navigation and phone call directory allowing me to make voice activated calls as i drive. The gas millage is Great! I drive about 50 minutes to and from work Monday thru Friday. I fill up the tank on Sunday and it last me to the following Sunday. My wife drives a Camery and works across the street from me. She fills up on sunday and it only last her till Thursday. On the the down side, Due to the new wider wheel base the Malibu does not corner well, so forget about making those smooth U turns. There is also some road noise on the hwy. The Malibu's trunk is extremely small, so be prepared to use the back seat at times. They also could have giving it a bit more pedal power, but overall for $21,000 - $23,000 so far, I've gotten more than my moneys worth!
這位Malibu買主與你說的不一樣
所有跟帖:
•
你現在去edmunds查,約低於invoice $3000
-xavet-
♂
(16 bytes)
()
02/25/2010 postreply
17:54:06
•
see what this user paid: Cheaper than a Civic
-xavet-
♂
(367 bytes)
()
02/25/2010 postreply
18:02:01
•
OTD 16079 include GM card $2000--->18000USD,more expensive than
-先想一想再說-
♂
(38 bytes)
()
02/25/2010 postreply
19:35:27
•
OTD 16079算了2000的,就是自己隻出16079
-three-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
02/25/2010 postreply
20:24:22
•
同樣4門auto最便宜的Civic也要$15645 +tax+TTL等,更貴
-booloolood-
♂
(68 bytes)
()
02/26/2010 postreply
06:38:21