用的是相當於SUV級別的車去碰撞任何類型, ... 比較有說服性。

So you are suggestting everybody buy SUV? But you hated so much!!!

From the article, you are implying that SUVs can do quite damage to all small cars. So again, bigger (SUVs are usually bigger than sedans) is safer?

所有跟帖: 

嗬嗬,我這裏麵有提到SUV的碰撞結果麽?拿相當於SUV級別 -woth- 給 woth 發送悄悄話 woth 的博客首頁 (82 bytes) () 04/16/2009 postreply 11:52:46

Because SUV is head on to other vehicle, and it is -Audi- 給 Audi 發送悄悄話 (133 bytes) () 04/16/2009 postreply 12:02:24

看看我的原文,關於正麵碰撞我是怎麽說的 -woth- 給 woth 發送悄悄話 woth 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 04/16/2009 postreply 12:10:19

more dangerous to others does not imply safer to self -cys254- 給 cys254 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 04/16/2009 postreply 13:10:42

Yes it does - if yourself are destroyed, how can you -Audi- 給 Audi 發送悄悄話 (139 bytes) () 04/16/2009 postreply 13:19:00

Not true -cys254- 給 cys254 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 04/16/2009 postreply 14:23:50

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!