撞車,吸能

來源: mdgg 2009-04-15 17:35:57 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (765 bytes)
There is no single test can tell the real safety of a car, and ----- what is this "safety" you guys are arguing about anyway? Do you mean the chances of being killed or seriously injured in any given car crash?

There are such statistical analysis already, which concluded that there is a reverse relation and association of the car mass and critical injuries including death based on 2 trauma center data with a total sample of more than 1000 patients seen in the emergent room after a car accident. This statistical data includes ANY accident involving injuries to the drivers and/or passengers.

Some want to be the eggs. Some want to be the rocks. Ideally they don't have to crash into each other. But when that happens, well, sorry for the eggs.

所有跟帖: 

small car hits a barrier it stops, big car falls under the cliff -icecube- 給 icecube 發送悄悄話 (14 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 21:47:14

Well, in certain cases, small car is safer than big car, but -cys254- 給 cys254 發送悄悄話 (201 bytes) () 04/16/2009 postreply 07:51:19

So you agree that generally bigger is safer? -Audi- 給 Audi 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 04/16/2009 postreply 10:36:47

Hey, statistics is too hard for some one with a low -Audi- 給 Audi 發送悄悄話 (3 bytes) () 04/16/2009 postreply 10:20:35

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”