http://www.southbayriders.com/forums/showthread.php?t=74649
主要數據內容如下:
I've heard a lot of "motorcycles are much more efficient and pollute much less than cars" in all of these debates about mc vs cars. I was curious, and put my bike on the 4-gas. Here are the results:
2006 Kawasaki Ninja zx6r (636cc), the bike is BONE stock, the only thing I've changed is tires and oil.
IDLE:
HC (ppm): 246
CO (%): 1.42
CO2 (%): 13.5
O2 (%): 0.8
4000 RPM
HC: 595
CO: 3.26
CO2: 12.3
O2: 0.8
Just to put this into perspective:
2001 Toyota Tacoma 4WD, 3.4L V6:
HC: 62
CO: 0.67
CO2: 14.40
O2: 2.06
According to those numbers, my supercharged truck is cleaner than my motorcycle. Too bad for the EPA, CARB, and anyone else who cares that when given the option, I'll take the bike.
Counter Point:
Truck: 15mpg, 62 HC, 62/15=4.1333333333
Bike: 38 mpg, 246 HC, 246/38=6.473684
6.5 > 4.1, therefore, the motorcycle emits more HC per mile.
主要數據內容如下:
I've heard a lot of "motorcycles are much more efficient and pollute much less than cars" in all of these debates about mc vs cars. I was curious, and put my bike on the 4-gas. Here are the results:
2006 Kawasaki Ninja zx6r (636cc), the bike is BONE stock, the only thing I've changed is tires and oil.
IDLE:
HC (ppm): 246
CO (%): 1.42
CO2 (%): 13.5
O2 (%): 0.8
4000 RPM
HC: 595
CO: 3.26
CO2: 12.3
O2: 0.8
Just to put this into perspective:
2001 Toyota Tacoma 4WD, 3.4L V6:
HC: 62
CO: 0.67
CO2: 14.40
O2: 2.06
According to those numbers, my supercharged truck is cleaner than my motorcycle. Too bad for the EPA, CARB, and anyone else who cares that when given the option, I'll take the bike.
Counter Point:
Truck: 15mpg, 62 HC, 62/15=4.1333333333
Bike: 38 mpg, 246 HC, 246/38=6.473684
6.5 > 4.1, therefore, the motorcycle emits more HC per mile.