回複:引擎橫置(transverse)不會是好車。

來源: wolfmanii 2009-02-27 07:35:09 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (868 bytes)
Every technology has a reason to exist. You can't
simply say "Engine Transverse" is bad.

Every thing has its cons and pros. I believe "Transverse" may cause some performance loss,
but may have some gain in other areas.

I checked this stuff on wikipedia, here is
what I found.

"A transverse engine is an engine in which the crankshaft is oriented side-to-side relative to the length of the vehicle. This is also sometimes called an east-west engine. Most modern front wheel drive vehicles use this engine orientation (with the exception of some Audis), while most rear wheel drive vehicles use a front-to-back longitudinal arrangement."


"This has also allowed for improved safety in a frontal impact, due to more front to back engine compartment space being created. The result is a larger front crumple zone."

所有跟帖: 

Crumple zone shmumple zone? -UberAlles- 給 UberAlles 發送悄悄話 (696 bytes) () 02/27/2009 postreply 08:31:02

Actually to correct myself, -UberAlles- 給 UberAlles 發送悄悄話 (121 bytes) () 02/27/2009 postreply 08:37:01

回複:Actually to correct myself, -wolfmanii- 給 wolfmanii 發送悄悄話 (103 bytes) () 02/27/2009 postreply 09:01:35

X -刀爺爺- 給 刀爺爺 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 05/11/2009 postreply 09:52:53

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”