haha,not bad.

來源: Morning3evening4 於 2012-12-16 10:30:56 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀： 次 (481 bytes)
本文內容已被 [ Morning3evening4 ] 在 2012-12-16 13:31:03 編輯過。如有問題，請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.
回答: the gun debate explains why people lose money 由 noconfusion 於 2012-12-16 09:42:44
Only one trade is underwater YTD by price. By comparison with no switch from US ETF, 2 trades are underwater,and 2 more are even.

what does this tell me? All results has it,s condition. The famous social study case, black has higher crime rate, was from statistics. until later deeper study by phasing in the economic situation, ther is almost no racial difference.

I am a poor scientist, I know when I send out a paper, the certain conditions are necessary for my result.

所有跟帖： 

• good, let's look at stats -noconfusion- ♂ 給 noconfusion 發送悄悄話 noconfusion 的博客首頁 (71 bytes) () 12/16/2012 postreply 10:49:10

• Did the tighter control results in any difficulty for criminals -Morning3evening4- ♂ 給 Morning3evening4 發送悄悄話 Morning3evening4 的博客首頁 (248 bytes) () 12/16/2012 postreply 10:56:47

• you are still doing 'fundamental analysis'.. -noconfusion- ♂ 給 noconfusion 發送悄悄話 noconfusion 的博客首頁 (27 bytes) () 12/16/2012 postreply 11:08:39

• I thought FA is necessary for investment.:). -Morning3evening4- ♂ 給 Morning3evening4 發送悄悄話 Morning3evening4 的博客首頁 (145 bytes) () 12/16/2012 postreply 12:34:54

請您先登陸，再發跟帖！

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”