Pro 30 in CA. Vote Yes or No?

來源: pediatrician2 2012-10-31 09:21:12 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (386 bytes)

YES: 0.25%  increase in sales tax and some increase in state income tax for family over 500k. Gov claims this money will be used for schools.The argument is that no one assures the money will be used for school and the money will be mostly likely to be wasted by gov.

who to trust? if the money will be used for school, i will vote YES.

 

 

所有跟帖: 

I will say YES -jjj7- 給 jjj7 發送悄悄話 jjj7 的博客首頁 (103 bytes) () 10/31/2012 postreply 10:06:17

no tax increase any time, even if it is for school -longtermInvestor- 給 longtermInvestor 發送悄悄話 longtermInvestor 的博客首頁 (295 bytes) () 10/31/2012 postreply 10:25:33

我們vote了YES。州長耍流氓,知道中產注重教育,威脅地說, -SunshineInCA- 給 SunshineInCA 發送悄悄話 (176 bytes) () 10/31/2012 postreply 10:42:05

基本上是流氓法案,屬於打土豪分田地的那種。 -texastrader- 給 texastrader 發送悄悄話 (97 bytes) () 10/31/2012 postreply 10:45:56

I'll vote NO. Gov. hijack the kids in the name of public educati -laoyangdelp- 給 laoyangdelp 發送悄悄話 laoyangdelp 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 10/31/2012 postreply 16:11:28

回複:I'll vote NO. Gov. hijack the kids in the name of public educ -rainsun1010- 給 rainsun1010 發送悄悄話 (134 bytes) () 10/31/2012 postreply 20:02:31

你投yes,可以保證下次選舉一定會再有一到兩個同樣法案出來,以各種為孩子為未來等理由。 -luckyd- 給 luckyd 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/31/2012 postreply 21:11:22

The less money the Gov has, the better. -Dream_Maker- 給 Dream_Maker 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/31/2012 postreply 23:16:32

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”