不完全同意

來源: WQPY 2012-02-10 13:56:24 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (1186 bytes)
回答: 不同意BayFamily2012-02-10 11:29:48

沒有讀出如何歧視against種族、收入階層、等等。

The problem is, obviously my personal opinion only, when a lot people are lazy, that's because they are allowed, simply doing nothing but still got taken care of. Now you can argue whether that's those people's problem, or the system's problem, or both.

The system, in civilized world, should take care of disable or disadvantaged, but not lazy or don't want to. People should be encouraged to work toward full potential and get rewarded. People don't want to work, may be allowed but only at minimal level, uncomfortable, not making them entitled for anything. You can't give everybody a 4BR SFH, 2 cars, 3 kids, 4 vacations, 5 dogs... plus full medical coverage.

On the other hand, this could happen only in those developed counties, when they were able to 掠奪 others in the past by military means, now in financial ways, maybe a bit longer by 耍無賴. Reality is, it's not sustainable.

The system, has be working for a while, is having a serious trouble: it can't self-correct itself. Now we know everybody has a vote: 屁股決定腦袋, and it's already happening that 肚皮決定屁股(數量和分布)。

所有跟帖: 

你說的對, -BayFamily- 給 BayFamily 發送悄悄話 BayFamily 的博客首頁 (400 bytes) () 02/10/2012 postreply 15:44:25

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”