wow, i just posted an early debate here and see chatGPT 建議

1. Focus on Inquiry, Not Challenge:
   Instead of framing comments as direct challenges (e.g., "Show your 20-year returns"), rephrase to seek genuine insight:
   "I'm curious about how timing has worked for you over the long term. Would you mind sharing an example or some data?"

2. Acknowledge Valid Points:
   Recognize that timing might work for certain individuals, even if rare. A phrase like:
   "You make a good point about avoiding major downturns. It's just hard to do consistently in my experience."
   can de-escalate the discussion.

3. Keep it Constructive:
   Focus on the shared goal of improving returns rather than repeating the same view:
   "Both strategies aim to optimize results. Perhaps there's a middle ground or lessons from each approach?"