What is the issue of the case?

來源: 檸檬椰子汁 2024-04-29 21:54:41 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (1790 bytes)
回答: 關鍵的問題是製藥公司不能walk away自了漢2024-04-29 21:38:42

https://www.cnbc.com/2024/04/29/jj-bristol-myers-squibb-lose-medicare-drug-price-talks-challenges.html

The negotiations don’t require drugmakers to “set aside, keep or otherwise reserve any of their drugs” for the use of the government or Medicare beneficiaries, he wrote. Quraishi added the talks don’t force manufacturers to physically transmit or transport drugs at a new negotiated price.

“Selling to Medicare may be less profitable than it was before the institution of the Program, but that does not make [J&J and Bristol Myers Squibb’s] decision to participate any less voluntary,” Quraishi wrote. “For the reasons provided, the Court concludes that the Program does not result in a physical taking nor direct appropriation” of medications from the two drugmakers. 

 

所有跟帖: 

意思是政府沒有強搶,不過是罰款而已? -tz2000- 給 tz2000 發送悄悄話 tz2000 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 04/29/2024 postreply 23:06:28

這個有點懸,好比政府征地,你不賣,就罰你款,好像不符合憲法。 -檸檬椰子汁- 給 檸檬椰子汁 發送悄悄話 檸檬椰子汁 的博客首頁 (45 bytes) () 04/30/2024 postreply 05:05:59

J&J 自己還揩自己的油 -檸檬椰子汁- 給 檸檬椰子汁 發送悄悄話 檸檬椰子汁 的博客首頁 (1877 bytes) () 04/30/2024 postreply 05:08:36

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”