一個政府釣魚,最後沒有實錘的案子

來源: tz2000 2019-01-24 10:37:09 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (1571 bytes)
本文內容已被 [ tz2000 ] 在 2019-01-24 10:41:25 編輯過。如有問題,請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.
回答: 很老實的白人檸檬椰子汁2019-01-24 07:42:04

一個評論

Thank you for proving my point where people mistake allegations as verdicts. This suit was brought as part of a nationwide inquiry against a number of companies, and the matter was ultimately settled without any finding of liability and without any admission of wrongdoing whatsoever, After two years in court, you would have to deduce that if the government could have proven their case, that they would have. Yet 43 years later, people only pick the parts that fit their agenda. If he was such a racist, shouldn't there be thousands of cases over his entire career? It's not like he's been hiding from the public this entire time. Did Donald Trump himself discriminate people of color? No proof whatsoever. Did his properties rent to people of color? Why yes they did (fact). People love suing rich people. That's because it's way easier to take from others than the work it takes to build your own wealth.

地主們學到的功課:低調,低調

當然在紐約有15,000個公寓要低調也挺難的

所有跟帖: 

這個傻瓜們是不懂得。他們以為都抓住小辮子了,但人家有律師團籌劃。 -sweetptt- 給 sweetptt 發送悄悄話 sweetptt 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 01/24/2019 postreply 12:23:09

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”