一胎化政策有沒有別的選擇？它已經被證明是錯的了。

我中文輸入靠平板手寫 ，完成正帖已經很吃力...

It is perfectly normal to have a writer like 魯迅 in such time, it is also perfectly normal to have political leaders like Mao in such time, or even now. So it isn't really about what choices Mao or Lu Xun had - they didn't. To be fair, they just acted according to their characters and talents - it is more about what choices China had. Perhaps, China didn't have much to make a choice. In Buddhist term, 福德不夠 in that time.

After, it hasn't turned out that bad, especially when put in comparisons with the experiences of many other non-western nations in the past few centuries. Many ceased to exist.

What I am against is justifying the unjustifiable, especially when it is a consequence of the unjustifiable, for, it is particularly misleading.

 

 

所有跟帖： 

• 如何證明的？ -波粒子3- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/10/2024 postreply 13:27:12

• Don't tell me you still can't see it. -中間小謝- ♂ (188 bytes) () 04/10/2024 postreply 14:51:07

• 不對 -波粒子3- ♂ (99 bytes) () 04/10/2024 postreply 15:22:10

• The "complex" dynamics shouldn't escape basic logic. -中間小謝- ♂ (837 bytes) () 04/10/2024 postreply 16:16:54

• 隻知道數學運算不知道數字背後代表的意義 -波粒子3- ♂ (93 bytes) () 04/10/2024 postreply 16:22:28

• 那麽，波粒子兄當時研究的結果是怎樣的？ -中間小謝- ♂ (54 bytes) () 04/10/2024 postreply 19:47:59

• 是正確的，符合馬爾薩斯人口論 -波粒子3- ♂ (81 bytes) () 04/10/2024 postreply 20:42:15

• 時中之道 -PingFanCQ- ♂ (595 bytes) () 04/10/2024 postreply 13:42:33