原因是:此人曾被別人報警說恐嚇別人,但此人否認,因為報警期間此人並未與報警人見麵,結果是12月要上庭。請問:如果雙方都沒有證據證明是否存在恐嚇,法官會怎麽判?怎樣證明沒有恐嚇別人?或怎麽從中解脫?謝謝!
幫別人討教:超速被警察抓到,驗ID後被拘留一晚上,
所有跟帖:
• law 101-- burden of proof is on the accuser -panzerkom- ♂ (0 bytes) () 11/14/2008 postreply 11:49:07
原因是:此人曾被別人報警說恐嚇別人,但此人否認,因為報警期間此人並未與報警人見麵,結果是12月要上庭。請問:如果雙方都沒有證據證明是否存在恐嚇,法官會怎麽判?怎樣證明沒有恐嚇別人?或怎麽從中解脫?謝謝!
• law 101-- burden of proof is on the accuser -panzerkom- ♂ (0 bytes) () 11/14/2008 postreply 11:49:07
WENXUECITY.COM does not represent or guarantee the truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any of communications posted by other users.
Copyright ©1998-2024 wenxuecity.com All rights reserved. Privacy Statement & Terms of Use & User Privacy Protection Policy