我第一次學法律的課，這個case不知道警察那裏錯了，謝謝大家幫忙看看

The accused was stopped at night in a routine roadside checkstop. The accused
did not show any signs of impairment. The police officer asked to see the accused’s license and registration and then shone his flashlight into the car. Without saying anything further, the officer asked what was inside a gym bag on the passenger seat; the accused replied “food” and showed the officer a plastic sandwich bag inside a brown paper bag. The officer became suspicious when he noticed glass vials of hash oil and some cannabis resin cigarettes. The accused was arrested for possession of a narcotic and later gave an incriminating statement to police.

Discuss whether any of the accused’s rights have been violated. Indicate the
arguments that might be used by the accused’s counsel and by the prosecutor at trial. Indicate what remedies would be available to a judge if there was a finding that the accused’s rights had been violated. Your discussion should refer to the legal issues that arise in this problem and the applicable legal rules.
警察有做錯什麽嗎？這個屬不屬於unreasonable search? 謝謝幫忙！

所有跟帖： 

• 回複：我第一次學法律的課，這個case不知道警察那裏錯了，謝謝大家幫 -單身老貓- ♂ (710 bytes) () 02/01/2006 postreply 22:58:17

• 回複：我第一次學法律的課，這個case不知道警察那裏錯了，謝謝大家幫 -apt- ♂ (2658 bytes) () 02/02/2006 postreply 09:47:27

• thanks sooooooo much~~~~~~~ -小臭豬- ♀ (0 bytes) () 02/02/2006 postreply 13:46:28