看這條

來源: 慧惠 2015-05-28 06:25:41 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (1052 bytes)
本文內容已被 [ 慧惠 ] 在 2015-05-28 06:27:38 編輯過。如有問題,請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.
Certain moving expenses, paid or reimbursed by the employer, are not taxable under the definition of U.S. wage income. To qualify as "non-taxable," the expenses generally must be accountable, substantiated and reasonable for the circumstances of the move. Expenses that can qualify as non-taxable include:

•The transportation of household goods and personal effects (including in-transit storage and insurance expenses) from the old residence to the new residence. The costs of moving automobiles and pets are included in this category.

https://ttlc.intuit.com/questions/2117559-can-i-claim-relocation-expenses-paid-by-employer-they-were-all-included-on-my-w-2-in-box-1

即使不應該claim 搬家費,因為公司付的,但也不應該叫taxable income.

所有跟帖: 

公司那樣做,隻能將錯就錯,要不就要讓改W2,不改硬來就過分,因為那樣會得了好處 -上流Man- 給 上流Man 發送悄悄話 上流Man 的博客首頁 (406 bytes) () 05/28/2015 postreply 10:45:56

所以你也覺得不完全是樓主無理對不對?補稅越多,罰的也越多,所以這次應該盡可能降低 -慧惠- 給 慧惠 發送悄悄話 慧惠 的博客首頁 (83 bytes) () 05/28/2015 postreply 16:21:13

公司有錯,樓主是錯上加錯;不當獲利(占了公司交的稅款)上萬,怎麽說也是相當嚴重的漏稅 -上流Man- 給 上流Man 發送悄悄話 上流Man 的博客首頁 (220 bytes) () 05/29/2015 postreply 06:24:14

同意,其實這是兩件事情。前者樓主謊報,需要補稅;後者弄清楚是否可以把搬家費 -慧惠- 給 慧惠 發送悄悄話 慧惠 的博客首頁 (273 bytes) () 05/29/2015 postreply 07:18:50

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”