不是指其本人，而是其學說，傳到中國。時間當然不是黃帝時期，而是內徑成書的時期。希伯的思想與內經非常相似，但早於內經。這種可能性是存在的。
出處：
希伯：
https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%B8%8C%E6%B3%A2%E5%85%8B%E6%8B%89%E5%BA%95
Slide 4:
The Huangdi neijing (The Inner Cannon of the Yellow Emperor) is far and away the most important early Chinese text dealing with human acupuncture. It may date to 200 BC, at the earliest. (Existing copies date to no earlier than the 5th to the 8th centuries AD, and may or may not accurately reflect what was in earlier editions.)
Slide 5:
Noted Sinologist and historian of Chinese medicine, Dr. Paul Unschuld, has observed that information presented in the Huangdi neijing is not necessarily even Chinese in origin. Qi Bo, the most important interlocutor of the Yellow Emperor in The Inner Cannon of the Yellow Emperor may be none other than Hippocrates of Cos. Unschuld P. Chinese Medicine. Brookline, Mass: Paradigm Press, 1998, Pg. 12 Hippocrates of Cos Paul Unschuld Human TCM:
Slide 6:
Hippocrates of Cos Qi Bo One and the Same?
Slide 7:
“The figure Qi Bo has no background in Chinese history or mythology, and this fact, together with the Han-period pronunciation of his name [G'ieg Pak], allows speculation that the fame of the Greek physician reached China two centuries after his death.” Unschuld P. Chinese Medicine. Brookline, Mass: Paradigm Press, 1998, Pg. 12 Hippocrates of Cos Paul Unschuld
Slide 8:
Obviously, for millennia both goods and ideas flowed in both directions along the Silk Road. Regardless, evidence that the roots of Chinese medicine might lie in the West has been almost entirely ignored by modern scholars. At least, that’s so with regard to human medicine. The West-to-East flow of medical ideas and practices has been more clearly documented in veterinary medicine.
