是關於pain and suffering settlement.
也許我沒說清楚
所有跟帖:
• 無論是保險公司賠你的車錢還是保險公司賠你的人身方麵的錢 -戰車上的狸花- ♀ (320 bytes) () 11/03/2008 postreply 12:43:49
• 解釋得真清楚。謝謝! -JuneJune- ♀ (0 bytes) () 11/03/2008 postreply 13:30:02
• can you point to the IRS Reg. that says so? -caliber- ♂ (1037 bytes) () 11/03/2008 postreply 15:33:32
• another more realistic example -caliber- ♂ (479 bytes) () 11/03/2008 postreply 15:42:52
• 可以看這裏 -戰車上的狸花- ♀ (882 bytes) () 11/03/2008 postreply 21:59:32
• that is not the law -caliber- ♂ (550 bytes) () 11/03/2008 postreply 22:20:38
• 唉。IRS是對GROSS INCOME 征稅的。如果你要弄清楚 -戰車上的狸花- ♀ (400 bytes) () 11/03/2008 postreply 23:09:04
• 我確實是為了較汁兒而較汁兒, 為了絞湖而絞湖 -caliber- ♂ (591 bytes) () 11/04/2008 postreply 09:47:15
• A correction: not all punitive payments are non-taxable. -如塵- ♀ (0 bytes) () 11/03/2008 postreply 15:44:24
• And not all compensatory damage is non-taxable either -caliber- ♂ (99 bytes) () 11/03/2008 postreply 15:47:36