數據分析 可以作個參考。 現在對PG 這個位子經常從多個角度去評估-

A good PG is usually a good floor general, passer, defender, and rebounder.

For example, CP is arguably the best PG in the league; Rondo distributes a bit more than Paul while Paul shoots a bit more. Nash excels in passing and shooting but he is a defensive liability which reduces his overall impact on the court and team wins - that's one of the reasons why Nash is not ranked as top 5 PGs. 

Additionally, the point guard position has evolved to where more of a focus is placed on shooting and scoring than ever before; therefore rebounding is another essential skill set to be looked at.

 

 

所有跟帖： 

• 我想你說的這幾點，吃這碗飯的專家們肯定都包括在他們的分析裏了。 -萬綠叢中- ♀ (87 bytes) () 05/13/2012 postreply 21:37:25

• 要看比賽實打實，數據做個參考吧。 -Net-A-Porter- ♀ (111 bytes) () 05/14/2012 postreply 02:58:18

• 說得沒錯，難道專家都是隻看數據的不看比賽的？不要太搞笑。隻不過很多判斷性的東西 -21312- ♀ (41 bytes) () 05/14/2012 postreply 09:11:55