個人資料
文章分類
正文

加州立法在中小學強行推行進行孌童及色情教育,這種立法沒有違背美國憲法嗎?

(2019-07-09 07:01:48) 下一個

https://dailycaller.com/2019/07/08/california-sexual-education

Mary Margaret OlohanSocial Issues Reporter 
July 08, 20199:32 PM ET 
  • The California Board of Education, Planned Parenthood, and the ACLU created and implement a progressive sex education and gender theory agenda.
  • Students are shown sexually explicit content from kindergarten through 12th grade.
  • Topics include fisting, blood play, masturbation, oral sex, and more.  
The California Board of Education implemented progressive sex and gender education curriculum in public schools across the state, regardless, in some cases, of parental knowledge or consent.
Progressive groups, including Planned Parenthood, collaborated on AB-329 in 2016 and the recently introduced Health Education Framework in May as highlighted by a video created by the conservative group, Our Watch. (RELATED: ACLU Told CA Teachers To Help Students Obtain Abortions Without Parental Notification, Video Reveals)


Both these pieces of education legislation mandate that school districts require sex ed and encourage students to question their parents on sexual topics – topics explored in the kindergarten through 12th grade sex education curricula implemented in California schools.
Lawmakers Create The California Healthy Youth Act, A Bill Mandating K-12 Sex Ed
AB-329, otherwise known as the California Healthy Youth Act, was created in 2016 and has several aimed purposes.
The bill aims to teach K-12 students how to ward off HIV and other STDs, to teach “healthy attitudes” towards sexual orientation, gender, and relationships, and to “promote understanding of sexuality as a normal part of human development.”
The bill also promises to “provide educators with clear tools and guidance to accomplish that end.”

AB-329 allows for parents to opt their children out of sexual education. However, the bill prohibits parents from opting their children out of materials that discuss gender, gender identity, gender expression and sexual orientation.
The law also prohibits abstinence-only education and prohibits any discussion of religious doctrine, according to an ACLU handout.
The handout adds that beginning in seventh grade, children must be taught “all FDA-approved methods preventing pregnancy and transmission of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (including condoms, contraceptives, and antiretroviral treatment) and abstinence.”
Educators Must “Affirmatively Recognize Different Sexual Orientations And Be Inclusive”


The California Board of Education introduced the Health Education Framework in May — a curriculum on sex education that some California parents found troubling, as the Christian Post reported in May.

The Health Education Framework affirms language in AB-329 and included books and supplemental materials such as the Amazon bestseller,S.E.X.: The All-You-Need-to-Know Sexuality Guide to Get You Through Your Teens and Twenties, a book that describes sexual activity and gender theory.
The California Board of Education removed this book and several others from the curriculum after outrage from Californian families, as reported by the Christian Post and reflected in the Health Education Framework.
The Health Education Framework notes that as AB-329 orders, teachers must “affirmatively recognize different sexual orientations and be inclusive of same-sex relationships in discussions,” and “teach about gender, gender expression, gender identity, and the harm of negative gender stereotypes.”
Board members for the Health Education Framework included school district representatives, teachers, and academics from across California as well as a school nurse.  The director Community Education and Outreach at Planned Parenthood Amy Streavel was also on the board, according to the California Department of Education.
A spokeswoman for the California Department of Education referred the Daily Caller News Foundation to the sections of the California Education code on a parents’ right to opt theirchild out of sex ed and the primary purposes of the California Healthy Youth Act when asked to comment. She did not respond when pressed for further comment.
Planned Parenthood did not respond to requests for comment from the DCNF.
Parents React To Positive Prevention Plus

California parent John Andrews of the Murrieta School District said that schools in his district are using Positive Prevention Plus Sex Ed Curriculum, a curriculum that contains explicit photos and drawings of sexual activity.
“They talk about anal and oral sex as an alternative to regular sex because you can’t get pregnant,” Andrews said in a June video posted June 26 by the conservative group Our Watch. The video generated no local or national media coverage until a tipster alerted the Daily Caller News Foundation.
WATCH:

“They talk about mutual masturbation,” he added.
“They discuss gender roles, the gender spectrum, and in the support materials … they take it even further. They discuss everything, topics like roleplaying for different genders, blood play, dental dams … fisting is mentioned. I mean, they mention it all.”
Screenshot of fifth grade materials included in Positive Prevention Plus provided by to the Daily Caller News Foundation by Pastor Tim Thompson.

Screenshot of fifth grade materials included in Positive Prevention Plus provided by to the Daily Caller News Foundation by Pastor Tim Thompson.

“If I were to show that material to a child, I would be brought up on charges,” Andrew said. “But somehow our public schools are allowed to teach this to junior high and high school kids.”
Screenshot of fifth grade materials included in Positive Prevention Plus provided by to the Daily Caller News Foundation by Pastor Tim Thompson.

The curriculum describes itself as “California’s best source for evidence-based instruction in Comprehensive Sexual Health Education and Teen Pregnancy Prevention.”
It also boasts full compliance with California and National Health Education Standards and California Education Code, including the “California Healthy Youth Act.”
Positive Prevention Plus was begun in as early as 1993, according to the curriculum’s website, in order to develop an HIV and AIDS prevention curriculum.
But California Education codes instituted in 2004 began specifying “the content of teen pregnancy prevention education.”
Research findings included in the curriculum show that use of Positive Prevention Plus results in student’s higher use of “reproductive health care services” more use of contraceptive services, and significant improvements in “the delay in the onset of sexual activity.”



Screenshot of Table of Contents for Teacher’s Use in Positive Prevention Plus curriculum.

The ACLU Trains Teachers To Bypass Parental Authority

The June Our Watch video shows a variety of factors involved in California’s progressive sex ed programs. Pastor Tim Thompson told the DCNF that he published the video through Our Watch to help make parents more aware of how progressive the California sex educational programs are.
“We knew parents had to see for themselves or else they weren’t going to believe it,” Thompson told the DCNF.
The video depictsACLU staff attorney Ruth Dawson instructing teachers on how to help students obtain abortions without parental knowledge or consent.
“Regardless of how old a student is, they can walk into a doctor’s office and consent to these services without parental consent,” says Dawson, according to footage from the video, referring to abortion when she said “these services.” She was initially misidentified in the video.
The ACLU attorney notes that these services include pregnancy and prenatal care, contraception, contraception, emergency contraception and abortion.
“And for these there is no parental notification.”
“I think a good way to think about all these services that California has decided are so important that we are going to allow minors to go into a doctor’s office and consent to these services,” Dawson added. “Because they are just that important and students need to be able to access them.”
The ACLU said in a statement to the DCNF that all statements made by ACLU representatives during the meeting are “in accord with California law” and claims the video was doctored. However, when pressed on the matter, the ACLU did not comment on what aspects of the video were doctored.
Activists And Experts Weigh In 
Get Out Now: Why You Should Pull Your Child from Public School Before It’s Too Late” author, attorney, and director of the Catholic Women’s Forum Mary Rice Hasson believes that most parents do not understand what their children are being exposed to — and often being exposed to without parental permission.
“The California sex and gender “health” curriculum shows kids explicit images, normalizes kinky and perverse sexual activity, and teaches kids that their basic identity — as male or female — is something fluid or changeable,” Hasson told the DCNF, saying that schools see parents as “obstacles or barriers to their efforts to indoctrinate an entire generation.”
“Parents — especially religious parents — are portrayed as ignorant or untrustworthy when it comes to issues of sexual identity or activity — as if only the schools can be trusted to ‘protect’ kids and teach them all about,” Hasson said.
Parental Rights In Education executive director Suzanne Gallagher told the DCNF that public schools in America are facilitating a national cultural crisis. Gallagher’s organization seeks to keep families up to date on infringements of parental rights in public schools across the nation.
“There is a clear political agenda to destroy the traditional family in America,” Gallagher told the DCNF. “Until now, the American family was considered to be the foundation of civic life; the smallest form of government, where children are taught responsibility, respect for authority, and national pride.”
Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

 

 

[ 打印 ]
閱讀 ()評論 (9)
評論
Sam大樹 回複 悄悄話 還以為父女通婚也合法化了!
幸好文中未提及。
westshore 回複 悄悄話 有過一個介紹荷蘭性教育的節目,非常明確地討論各種性行為的內容一般從小學高年級開始,即青春期開始的年齡(因為食品的問題,如今女孩第二性征開始平均年齡是9.5歲,遠早於過去12歲的概念),錯過這個窗口孩子容易有麻煩。荷蘭父母認為是很正常的事情,孩子會在餐桌上公開與父母討論學校有關的性教育內容。
就是什麽年齡幹什麽事,孩子在這個階段需要一個正常的性心理,沒有恐懼感,否則以後容易出極端行為。美國在性教育方麵屬於世界上比較落後的。
美國家庭有個並不罕見的現象就是親屬對小孩子的性侵犯,白種人中相對多,孩子如果沒有相應性知識就會有可怕的後果,尤其是第二性征開始發展的孩子會留下一輩子的心理影響(更小的孩子反倒容易走出來,因為沒有性意識)。總之,性是個自然現象,相應的求知欲會隨著身體的變化而產生,不能錯過教育窗口。
再有,你是希望孩子會在餐桌上與你討論不懂的性有關的內容,還是去擔心孩子,尤其是女孩,做出什麽愚蠢的事情,甚至不願意讓你知道?
隻有孩子認為這是個很平常的問題,才有可能與你討論,而這就需要學校的教育引導。
頂頂牛 回複 悄悄話 家長覺得孩子小, 性侵犯不覺得你家孩子小。

華裔家長死腦子, 不從學校裏學到,難道去網上和A片裏得到性教育嗎?
選民 回複 悄悄話 這幾張照片是9年級以上的教材, 14, 5歲的高中生以經非常成熟了, 許多已經有性經驗.
ahhhh 回複 悄悄話 @選民,這貼的不就是教材嗎?你怎麽會裝聾作啞?你有幫助你的材料貼出來。
選民 回複 悄悄話 請讀一下加州小學性教育大綱和使用的教學材料, 完全不是象這篇文章所描述的那樣.
文取心 回複 悄悄話 樓下請讀一下原文,僅僅是性教育嗎?我看比色情雜誌‘閣樓’差不到哪兒去。
選民 回複 悄悄話 對兒童的性教育要盡早, 對提高兒童自我防範意識有很大的幫助. 在美國幾乎所有對女童, 男童, 的性侵來源於親友, 熟人, 師長. 利用孩子對性的無知, 騙取孩子信任, 以為對其的性侵活動是正常的遊戲, 或對其關心喜愛的表示.

如果你家裏有女童, 男童, 還是盡早給他們性教育
BillyZ 回複 悄悄話 變態民主黨不把加州搞垮誓不罷休,這幫人渣。
登錄後才可評論.