HIGH周刊

評點大千股壇,馳騁股市風雲
正文

EXP: 非常具有吸引力

(2006-10-02 07:42:43) 下一個
巴菲特的投資理念有時就是一句話:隻買行業龍頭。因此USG成為萬眾矚目下巴老的又一個行業龍頭投資;可是行業老二難道就沒有希望了?周刊認為EXP將來會給出一個正確答案。

USG:47元,巴老40元買入的股票;EXP呢?目前33+,公司老板也在最近大力買入:

Laurence Hirsch of EXP has made a huge bet that commercial property seems to be on a different level than the housing market. How big a bet? $14+ million, equivalent to approximately 400K on his personal account. Prior to EXP, Mr. Hirsch had been the CEO of Centex (NYSE: CTX), the homebuilder that spun off EXP in 2004.

EXP is the 2nd largest producer of gypsum wallboard, also known as drywall, after USG Corp (NYSE: USG), where Warren Buffetts Berkshire Hathaway raised its stake to 17.3% just last month.

The US Geological Survey (USGS) reported that crushed stone production in the first quarter of 2006 was 324 million metric tons, up 5.8% from the year-earlier level of 306 million metric tons. According to USGS data, the rise was due to favorable weather conditions and increased activity in commercial, private and public construction.

Aside from wallboard, which generates some 50% of sales and the bulk of its revenue, EXP also makes cement, ready-mix concrete, recycled paperboard, and aggregates. It sells primarily to residential, commercial, and industrial construction customers located near its plants in the western and southwestern US

Trouble is, rough estimates from analysts and materials suppliers suggest that between 40% and 50% of wallboard demand comes from new residential construction. Less that mediocre forecasts from homebuilders such as Toll Brothers (NYSE: TOL) and D.R. Horton (NYSE: DHI) together with disappointing new-home sales data leaves little doubt that the residential market is slowing. What Hirsch is banking on is that this slack will be taken up by the commercial construction and home remodeling markets, which remain robust.

On the other hand, prices of commercial property have always been more volatile than those of housing, partly because the supply lags are longer. Developers plan new buildings when prices rise, but it often takes years to get planning permission and to construct a building, by which time demand may have fallen.

Booms and busts in commercial property caused widespread banking problems in the early 1990s, when property prices fell by 50% in America and Britain and by 70% to 80% in Japan and Sweden. The bursting of a huge property bubble was also a prime cause of Thailands financial crisis in 1997-98.

Will history repeat itself? At least Mr. Hirsch does not think so and with about 47 million square feet of new office space expected to be completed this year, up 30% from 2005, and completions projected to increase 37% to 65 million square feet next year, he has good reason to believe EXP is well placed to cope with a residential market that is turning sour.

The 1st Q results were pretty good. They saw an increase of 26.9% to $259.97 million in revenues translating into a rise of 69.3% to $59.09 million of earnings, or $1.16 a share compared with 64 cents a year earlier. EXP expects to earn $1.30 a share to $1.40 a share in the 2nd Q and $4.40 a share to $4.70 a share for the full year.

With the stock at $36.69 on a Fwd. PE of 7.72 and an extremely low PEG of 0.21, Hirsch may have a point in thinking EXP is cheap.

基金大顎Barcleys(巴克萊)也在最近大力持倉11.31%,雖然今年以來房市不景,但是上月的新屋數據卻沒有繼續為這種景象背書反而超出市場預期。既然巴菲特這個時候進軍USG,作為行業亞軍的EXP也恐怕沒有理由不被看好。上周公司lower FY07的EPS,股價受到打壓,今日早盤再次探到33元上方,這個漂亮的W底是不是真底?高總編決定棄USG,今早在33.05買入1000股EXP,欲與巴克萊共舞!
[ 打印 ]
閱讀 ()評論 (2)
評論
not4kids 回複 悄悄話 高總,下麵是我對USG,EXP valuation的一點淺見:

USG is much cheaper stock than EXP today.

Here is comparison of last Q earning:

EXP: $1.16 per share

PE on normalized annual run rate: $33.57/(1.16 * 4) = 7.2

USG net earning $176 million
Total share count after rights offering: 90 million

USG per share earning = 176/90 = $1.96 per share

PE on normalized annual run rate: 47.3/ (1.96 * 4) = 6.0


You will see that, still USG is significantly cheaper than EXP under last Q earning.

On valuation based on the forward earning estimation, I don't consider that is good comparison. USG is leader in wallboard, much bigger than EXP. There is no reason to believe that EXP can out-perform USG in wallboard market. Both are in wallboard market, but USG is bigger and stronger stock. There is no reason to believe that small companies should trade at higher valuation than bigger and dominant player. Forward estimate is from Wall Street analysts, we don't base our valuation on their estimate.

Second of all, USG is not pure Wallboard manufacturing company. USG had 30% of revenue in ceiling and in distribution business.
Distribution business is not same as wholesale manufacturer. It is like retail business of building material. Ceiling is not same as Wallboard, Majority of ceiling business is in commercial real estate market, and is not linked to residential housing market.

So yeah, EXP has 40% of revenue in cement, but USG has 30% of business in distribution and ceiling too.
xiamai 回複 悄悄話 if you can share and update your holding in your blog, that will be better. It also easy for new player like me to learn and understand your opinion., thanks for your share.
登錄後才可評論.