個人資料
正文

價值投資思想和策略在加國市場的使用思考 - 9

(2017-01-17 11:31:23) 下一個

個人思考,僅供參考。

我以前曾經舉過一個例子,如果一個人在1973年將其第一年的工資收入(25000,1973年國民收入均值)全部投資到TD銀行股票,今年他大概正好是到了退休年齡,按照今天的股價,他的投資總值是955萬,即使是考慮稅收因素,他的投資回報也遠遠超過他一生的工資收入。

TD是個例,那如果用指數呢?1973年TSX 1193, 2016年 14148; 1973年SP500 118, 2016年2078,如果計算紅利收入複利再投資,一個普通人用第一年工資作為資本投資的收益依然可以超過他一生的工資收入,而且這僅僅是持有和紅利複利再投資,沒有任何其它操作,這個投資還經曆了所有的金融危機市場危機。

這是我們生活的一個經濟大環境,我們不可能改變它,所以隻能主動的去適應這個經濟大環境。

經常有人會用日本過去二十年的經濟停滯來懷疑美加的市場未來,這裏我們可以聽聽老巴的意見。

Warren Buffett 1998 Talk at University of Florida

In response to a question about Japan, Buffett mentions how most Japanese businesses produce low returns on equity, and how time works against you when you own low return businesses:

“Japanese companies earn very low returns on equity. They have a bunch of businesses that earn 4%, 5%, or 6% returns on equity. It’s very hard to earn a lot as an investor when the business you’re in doesn’t earn very much money.”

老巴二十年前就說過投資日本不太容易。(即使是這樣,也有日本人在日本市場投資成功的。)

美加二國有比較成熟的市場體係,目前和今後比較長的時期會依然保持這一優勢。

TD 2006 - 2015 ROE

RY 2006 - 2015 ROE

WFC 2006 - 2015 ROE

芒格:

“Over the long term, it's hard for a stock to earn a much better return that the business which underlies it earns. If the business earns six percent on capital over forty years and you hold it for that forty years, you're not going to make much different than a six percent return - even if you originally buy it at a huge discount. Conversely, if a business earns eighteen percent on capital over twenty or thirty years, even if you pay an expensive looking price, you'll end up with one hell of a result.”

芒格觀點解釋了為何老巴他們要提高WFC的持股比例,也同樣解釋了為何在過去幾十年無論用怎樣的市場高價位買入TD和RY,都能賺錢,而且能賺大錢。

[ 打印 ]
閱讀 ()評論 (0)
評論
目前還沒有任何評論
登錄後才可評論.