Excellent question — and you're pointing to a deeper truth about why ethics in scholarship isn’t just personal virtue, but a structural foundation for societal progress.
Let’s first translate and then expand:
交論文前隻要被曝光報導過後，再交上去就變成抄襲了！
最後努力學習成果常常變成隱藏，然後漸漸地大家都變成藏私。
社會漸漸地不再進步，很多好的東西不再為人所知，
而隻會演變成誰拳頭大、地位高，誰就有發言權……
最後整個國家退化……
一個國家沒了創新，這個結局都是製度問題。
If your work has been reported or disclosed publicly before submission, it might be deemed “plagiarism” even if it’s your own effort!
In the end, genuine learning achievements are often hidden away.
People begin to hoard knowledge instead of sharing it.
As a result, society stops progressing. Many great ideas are no longer known or shared.
Eventually, it all comes down to power—those with fists or status get to speak.
And when that happens, the whole country regresses.
A nation without innovation faces decline — and the root of it all is a broken system.
If someone’s honest work is labeled “plagiarism” due to bureaucratic rules (e.g., preprints or media reports), the system punishes openness.
→ Result: People stop sharing. Knowledge gets locked away.
If only those with connections or status get their voices heard, then truth and insight no longer drive progress — hierarchy does.
→ This destroys motivation and fairness.
In fear of being scooped, misinterpreted, or unfairly penalized, researchers become secretive.
→ Scientific culture shifts from “build together” to “hide and survive.”
If the public sees that good work goes unrewarded—or worse, punished—they lose faith in the system.
→ Innovation declines. Cynicism rises.
→ A nation without innovation is a nation on the path to decline.
Academic ethics is not just about avoiding plagiarism.
It’s about preserving a system where truth matters more than power, where collaboration beats secrecy, and where innovation flows because credit is earned, not stolen or suppressed.
Without ethical ground rules, scholarship becomes just another power game. And when that happens, the nation itself pays the price.
Let me know if you’d like this framed as a public commentary or expanded into an editorial.
Yes — you’re absolutely on point. Let’s refine and expand your insight for clarity and punch:
Without ethical ground rules, scholarship devolves into a power game.
But ethical ground rules are themselves a form of power — not the power to dominate, but the power to protect fairness, amplify truth, and level the playing field.In that sense:
Ethics powers up the game of scholarship — it sets boundaries that stop cheaters from stealing ideas, and it builds trust so that knowledge can be shared without fear.
"Ethical ground rules don't restrict the game of scholarship — they energize it.
They prevent theft, reward originality, and ensure that ideas rise by merit, not manipulation.
Without rules, it’s just a rigged game of power. With rules, it becomes a shared pursuit of truth."
Ironically, in the final exam, that same classmate was caught cheating in the classroom—while I earned the top score.
Years later, I ran into that same TA. He explained why he had suspected me: my classmate’s homework was concise and to the point, while mine was wordy and meandering. To him, it looked like I had taken someone else’s answer and padded it clumsily. C.L.S.W.
我也有過類似的經歷，不過我沒那麼裝腔作勢。當時隻是被同學照抄作業，老師先看到對方的作業，就誤以為我是抄襲者。有趣的是，期末考試中，那位同學當場被抓作弊，而我考了最高分。
多年以後，我在某個場合遇到當年的助教。他解釋說，當初懷疑我，是因為那位同學的作業簡明扼要、邏輯清晰，而我寫得囉嗦、沒抓住要點，讓他以為我是從對方那裡「改抄」而來。
@李忠良-k8d
2 days ago