Angelina Jolie, Natalie Portman, Emma Watson vs Jackie Chan

在演藝上最好; however, society asks for actors to help the public better the world. Many actors did well, such as Angelina Jolie, Natalie Portman, and Emma Watson, who acted as ambassadors of UN peace.

• 但你要有這個眼界，其一。其二，Jolie, Portman, 和watson是為公認的public courses 代言

但你要有這個眼界: Earning entrance tickets is like "pay-to-play," neither free to speak nor grass-rooted for a better world. Collective intelligence warrants a better society for all, which can not rely on elites alone. In particular, the elites are eroding morally now. 

** 

What is Emma Watson's favorite thing to do?
On a regular basis, Emma keeps up with her journaling, which is one of her favorite things. She has over 30 journals on everything from yoga, dreams, acting, people she's met, and advice she's received. Emma Watson's daily prompts of reflecting on magic journaling on the page using a pen to write on paper-based notebooks, not on electronic notebooks!
1. Write 3 things that were fun or joyful (to boost brain power)
2. Write 3 things that happened that were kind (Acts Of Kindness)
3. Write 3 things that I did well or that I liked about myself (Self Affirmations).

**

這類話要看語境。廣義上，本貭上，人需要"組織"起來，不是"管"起來，而且不光中國人.

As an analogy, language serves this purpose by organizing the human mind with all its vocabularies and grammatical rules.

But does a language restrict "管'' the mind? Discipline the mind? Manipulate the mind? Lead the mind? Mislead the mind?... Yes, all true. But which assertion stands out TRUER than the others depends on the context.

I'm not sure about the context from which Jacky Chan derived his comment. He doesn't seem like an intelligent commentator in general, though he thinks he is at least an honest one. "A mistake made by all men..." He believed everybody was like him.

A mistake made by all men. Not true. Nothing is for ALL.

 

來源: 中間小謝 於 2024-03-23 10:26:04

• 成龍很有天分的藝人而藝人往往憑第六感來發言他的這番言論應該不是偽裝 - TJKCB - ♀   (5225 bytes) (90 reads) 03/22/2024  13:37:31

• “世界上沒有什麽人不需要管。法律就是管人的”：同意。 - snowandlotus - ♀   (0 bytes) (4 reads) 03/22/2024  17:02:33 (1)

• 這樣說確實不妥。要說“人人都有liberty 而liberty 本來就要求遵守規範” 就沒人反對勒：） - stonebench - ♂   (0 bytes) (6 reads) 03/22/2024  19:34:58 (2)

• 這孩紙，都被逼成八麵銅牆六方鐵壁了：） - snowandlotus - ♀   (0 bytes) (1 reads) 03/23/2024  06:02:31 (1)

• 大哥高見，您這麽表述才對。據此， “世界上沒有什麽人不需要管。法律就是管人的”的說法是錯誤的。 - Zewu-Lin - ♂  (154 bytes) (6 reads) 03/23/2024  09:31:02

• “世界上沒有什麽人不需要管”給成年人最直觀的印象是人甘願做奴隸或弱 智兒。縱然後麵再添上“法律就是管人的”也無濟於事於事 - Zewu-Lin - ♂  (21 bytes) (2 reads) 03/23/2024  09:42:39

• 藝人作為公眾人物，還是把天分和第六感用在演藝上最好 - 老鍵 - ♂   (0 bytes) (2 reads) 03/22/2024  17:09:03 (1)

• 好萊塢幹啥的 - 美國老師 - ♂   (0 bytes) (1 reads) 03/23/2024  08:46:08

• 在演藝上最好; however, society asks for actors to help public for - TJKCB - ♀   (14168 bytes) (1 reads) 03/23/2024  12:02:47

• 這類話要看語境。廣義上，本貭上，人需要"組織"起來，不是"管"起來，而且不光中國人. - 中間小謝 - ♂  (850 bytes) (7 reads) 03/23/2024  10:26:04 (1)

• A mistake made by all men. Not true. Nothing is for ALL. - TJKCB - ♀   (0 bytes) (1 reads) 03/23/2024  11:52:44

• 被逼成八麵銅牆六方鐵壁: Out of context is neither logical nor correct. - TJKCB - ♀   (161 bytes) (1 reads) 03/23/2024  11:56:02

• Under either 八麵銅牆 or 六方鐵壁, you can discuss - TJKCB - ♀   (0 bytes) (0 reads) 03/23/2024  11:56:22 

世界上沒有什麽人不需要管。法律就是管人的，當今世界沒有一個國家沒有法律。這是事實。在現階段，特別需要管，也是一個不爭的事實。——許博淵

https://www.cctv.com/fuxingbbs/special/mryw/04/22/index.shtml 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2lMrR16YbQ