上一篇,我預測川普會以崩塌式(landslide)擊敗希拉莉,成為美國的第一任韜奮總統。
這是我作為一個資深韜奮人,對川普這個人,以及對目前國內國際形勢進行分析以後得出的結論。
這兩大規律的validity,是以另一條更深刻的原理為基礎的。這個原理就是人性是不變的。所謂江山易改,本性難移,也可以說,撼山易,撼本性難。中國鄉下有句俗話,“三歲看大,七歲看老。”是同樣的意思。
為什麽說這條原理決定了兩大規律的可行性呢?原來正因為一個人的本性不容易隨意改變,那這個人的家庭,成就,都不僅僅代表過去,而且還對現在和未來具有指導作用。
好了,現在說回川普。當然,如果你同意我的兩大規律一大原理,你恐怕多少已經知道我的結論了。
當然,你可能會說,$50億不多,但我可以告訴你,能在46年內,從20萬漲到50億,平均每年的return大致是25%!
~~~~~~~~~ Fact checking -- "$20萬。那年他24歲" ? http://www.politifact.com/florida/article/2016/mar/07/did-donald-trump-inherit-100-million/
Donald Trump often talks about his success as a businessman creating thousands of jobs. But Marco Rubio says Trump hardly pulled that off on his own.
Among their many testy exchanges at the Republican debate in Detroit on March 3, 2016, was how much wealth Trump inherited.
"He talks about these great businesses that he's built," Rubio said. "He inherited over $100 million."
Trump interjected: "Wrong. Wrong. Wrong."
Trump added, "First of all, I got a call from my sister and brother tonight, and they said, ‘We had no idea Dad gave you $200 million.’ Believe me, I started off with $1 million. I built a company that's worth more than $10 billion. And I say it not in a bragging way, but that's the kind of thinking we need."
Did Trump inherit over $100 million as Rubio said at the March 3 debate? Trump did inherit money, but we could find no independent way to confirm the amount, so we are not rating the statement on our Truth-O-Meter. However, we will review what we do know about Trump's finances.
Trump’s inheritance
We asked a Rubio spokesman for his evidence that Trump inherited more than $100 million. (Rubio cited an even higher number of $200 million at a Feb. 25 debate.)
"The evidence would be on Donald Trump's tax returns right? Guess he'll need to shoot those on over to disprove the claim," Joe Pounder told PolitiFact. "Until then, all we have is his word that his inheritance was split amongst family members … All we know is there was an inheritance of up to $200 million. Donald Trump has never disputed the inheritance."
But news reports show that it’s a bit of a mystery how much Trump inherited from his father, Fred Sr. When he died in 1999, the New York Times reported that "his estate has been estimated by the family at $250 million to $300 million." The New York Daily News reported at the time that the estate was worth $100 million to $300 million based on family estimates.
But how was it divvied up? That’s something that reporters have tried to sort out during the 2016 race.
The New York Times reported Jan. 2 that Fred Sr.’s will "divided the bulk of the inheritance, at least $20 million, among his children and their descendants, ‘other than my son Fred C. Trump Jr.’ "
Some of the grandchildren sued, and an "amicable" settlement was worked out.
But Donald Trump received money from his father long before his death.
A National Journal writer, S.V. Dáte, estimated Trump started with $40 million in 1974 when he became president of his father’s real estate company. By one estimate, the firm was worth about $200 million. Divided among Donald Trump and his four siblings, each would have received $40 million.
But the company wasn’t liquidated that year, so Trump didn’t receive that as cash.
In 1982, after running his father’s firm for eight years, Forbes magazine estimated Trump’s worth at $200 million.
Pounder cited a couple other articles about Trump’s career and wealth or his father, but neither explained how much he inherited.
A Trump spokeswoman disagreed with Rubio’s claim but did not provide any evidence to refute it.
Rubio has a point that Trump isn’t entirely a self-made man. Trump took over his father’s business, and he inherited money when his father died. Verifying the specific amounts remains difficult.
~~~~~~~~~~`
也許你會問,那又怎樣?川普有五家公司破產,還有他的Trump University被人告。你怎麽不提?
~~~~~~~~~~~~``
原文在這裏:“Men wish to marry Melanias and raise Ivankas.”
對應地,川普不可能是傻子,不可能是騙子,也不可能是瘋子,因為這不符我上述的兩大規律及一大原理,自然也就不符合邏輯, 嗬嗬。
在這個係列的第一篇文章裏,我預測川普會以崩塌(landslide)式大敗希拉莉,成為美國第一任韜奮總統。
我搶答!川普的紅旗還會一直打下去。我仍然堅信,川普會在十一月以崩塌(landslide)式大敗希拉莉,成為美國第一任韜奮總統。
畢竟,如果你是川粉,他要是連這個小風浪也擔當不起,將來如何勝任管理國家的重擔?他不值得你去粉他。 如果你是希粉,川普不堪一擊,希拉莉幾乎是不戰而屈人之兵,你應當彈冠相慶才是。
所以,大家都靜下心來看戲,讓川普去做川普,讓川普去擔心川普的問題吧。
上一篇,我分析了川普的成就及家庭,邏輯上得出的結論是,川普不是傻子,不是騙子,更不是瘋子。
現在,讓我們來看看他是不是希特勒,racist, 和sexist。
我曾經試圖找出最早將川普比做希特勒的出處。但找不到完全讓我信服的答案。最有可能的原因,是在今年三月五日,川普在奧蘭多的競選集會上,號召他的支持者舉手宣誓投票給他。原文在這裏:
如果民主黨真正相信川普是希特勒,是racist,是sexist,而他又在今年十一月當選的話,會有什麽後果呢?
一個可能的後果是:奧巴馬作為總統,有責任,有義務頒布戒嚴令,拒絕下台,以保護人民遭受滅頂之災!
反之,如果民主黨相信川普不是希特勒,不是racist,不是sexist,那他們為什麽還要這麽說呢?
下一篇,我會繼續從韜奮者的角度,分析一下不騙,不瘋,不傻,不是希特勒,不是racist,不是sexist的川普,為什麽會有意無意,落人口實,給人造成這種感覺呢?這家夥到底在幹什麽?
http://blog.wenxuecity.com/myblog/68079/201608/1203204.html