雨前茶
雨前茶
正文
Did Michael Phelps Really Win That 7th Gold,
Or Was This a Conspiracy of Olympic Proportions?
On August 15th a corporately-owned athlete by the name of Michael Phelps participated in a 100-meter Butterfly finals race at the 2008 Beijing Olympics. He was heavy favorite to win this race, despite losing the same race in qualifying session against someone who is, in an ignorant world we live in today, commonly refered to as \'some guy\', but who in the world of competitive swimming is actually the \'big fish\' by the name of Milorad Cavic. The world\'s media attention turned toward Phelps expecting him to tie Mark Spitz\' 36-year-old record. The world\'s biggest stage was set. The show had to go on.
As it turned out, Michael Phelps did not start this race as expected. At the 50-meter mark he was only 7th out of 8th participants. Milorad Cavic led the race from start to finish, including at the 50-meter mark. Toward the end of the race, it appeared that Phelps closed on Cavic\'s lead, but still could not manage to beat him. The eyes of all the spectators in the aquatic center in Beijing, as well as those millions around the world, clearly saw that Milorad Cavic has won the race. Televised replays from all the different angles, including the one from underwater cameras, clearly showed that Cavic was the fist one to touch the wall. Television replays also showed Michael Phelps\' coach Bob Bowman disappointedly muttering: He\'s got him. (meaning that Cavic beat Phelps). Phelps\' own mother sitting in the audience in all her confusion raised two fingers in the air as if accepting that her son came in second. Even Phelps himself, in the fist couple of seconds after the finish, appeared to be subdued knowing/believing that he lost the race. But, something happened there, and the official timekeeper of the event OMEGA showed that Phelps supposedly won by 0.01 of a second. That is 100th part of one second, and the lowest margin of difference allowed in the official swimming contests.
100TH OF A SECOND?
Yes, the underwater sensors of the official timekeeper of the event, the watchmaker OMEGA, have determined that Michael Phelps, has won this race by 0.01 of a second.
0.01 OF A SECOND?
Was this an ad for OMEGA or what?
But the devil is indeed in the detail.
How is it that the official timekeeper of the event is the same company that sponsors Phelps since 2004? Isn\'t there a clear conflict of interest here? You know how deligthtfully messed up that is?? That\'s like having Tim Donaghy officiating in NBA games, and also placing bets on them. And why are leading FINA officials unashamedly and brazenly the biggest cheerleaders of Michael Phelps? We are not talking about NBC and other American-broadcasters who have clear interest in weaving the mythical narrative in their sickening quest for the largest share of ratings, and for purposes of appeasing (read: licking asses of) their advertisers (and therefore for their economical ends) who buy such ridiculously overpriced ad slots. We are not talking about millions of average American fans who are being assaulted by some of the biggest sport-related media hype in history (Hi Bob!). We are not talking about millions of biased American fans that only care that Phelps is an American who kicks ass. We are not talking about millions of white Americans who rejoice and cherish the success and worldwide fame of an all-white athlete in a sport where speed, stamina and physical contributions are of outmost importance. Instead, we are talking about the officials of FINA, the supposedly neutral governing and regulating body of this sport. Think of the possibilities of inbreeding my friends. Considering that Milorad Cavic did beat Phelps head-to-head in qualifying session, and since Milorad Cavic posted better time than Phelps and everbody else in the semifinals, OMEGA & FINA had plenty of time to make sure that Phelps wins the final session, even if it had to be by the narrowest of allowed margins. Shame on you FINA! Shame on you OMEGA! Shame on you IOC for allowing this charade to unfold in front of our very own eyes!
And if you think this is just about one race in some stupid sport that nobody cares about, think again.
This is the end my friend. Dumbing down of America before the marketing and media and political gods is long complete. Knowingly or not we are in it just for the sake of chasing our own tails. Eating our own young. We are part of the societal and global loop structure that is larger than the capability of our individual comprehension of the matters that concern us and our well-beings. We are pre-wired, pre-programmed, and our basic emotions and life experiences are pre-determined. We are intellectual cyborgs that have inbred and self-mutated. Worst of all -- we come with no expiration date.
So rejoice away my friends, and look forward to another manufactured spectacle brought to you by the masters of the global loop whose unwitting part you are. No amount of Bob Costas-induced stupor will change that.
But until that time, WE DEMAND that IOC cease this downright wrong practice of allowing athletes\' sponsors, in individual sports, to also be the timekeepers of the events where those athletes appear. Just like people, electronics can be tinkered with. Similarly, we demand that OMEGA employs a third party that will certify their results. Not that that would make it a fool proof, but it would ad an extra layer of assurance. At the moment the certification is done by OMEGA itself. In other words, OMEGA certifies that OMEGA is reliable. If that is not a \'self-fellatio\' we don\'t know what is. So as it stands, not only is the potential abuse always present, but the whole thing is completely in contravention of the original aim of the Olympic games; which was a celebration of human spirit via achievements of the human body; as opposed to today\'s Olympic \'spirit\' which is nothing but a celebration of corporate greed and commercial excess by way of contemporary drugged-up gladiators in their pursuit of hefty endorsements and 5 minutes of fame. As late as 20 years ago the Olympics featured only amateur athletes. Since the IOC has gotten in cahoots with the greedy American and international corporations who saw a potential in planetary profits and their brand promoting and positioning on a global scale, nothing was ever the same again. Do we really believe that Usain Bolt superbly and effortlessly dominated his field because he ate sugar cereal this morning? In an age where designer steroids are being synthesized by thousands so as to avoid detection methods, is anything real any more? We now have obscenely professional U.S. athletes that are not reliably tested in their own leagues (read NBA) dominating the Olympic competition without any \'checks and balances\' that are required of other Olympic athletes. You\'re not gonna tell us that Kobe Bryant will be required to piss in a small bottle to satisfy some test? You\'re not gonna tell us that a billion-dollar man-beast LeBron James will be denied his gold medal just because he was probably using human growth hormons since the time he was in a kindergarten (HGH, by the way, can\'t be detected by any tests). In the contemporary Olympic spectacle even horses are not safe from doping. What\'s next, Barry Bonds and Rafael Palmeiro lining up to get their Olympic gold with a needle hanging up their ass??
But we digress...
Finally, WE also DEMAND that somebody in the U.S. organizes a swimmimg event which would feature another race just between Michael Phelps and Milorad Cavic. But with a catch. That Phelps and Cavic be strictly forbidden for being personally paid for this event. Instead, their share of the proceeds should go to the charities of their choice. This race between the two swimmers would not only be a commercial success for its organizers and pay-per-view broadcasters (and it\'s all about $ isn\'t it,) but will also, perhaps, clear some doubt that was obviously raised in connection with the way how Phelps obtained his 7th gold medal at the 2008 Beijing Olympics. Most importantly, by donating their fees from this event to the charities of their choice these athletes would contribute to the greater cause, which is probably something that is lacking from their me-me-me agenda at the moment.
Facts:
Milorad Cavic beats everybody, including Michael Phelps head-to-head (QUALIFYING SESSION) at the 2008 Beijing Olympics (Source: Yahoo Olympics)
Milorad Cavic beats everybody, including Michael Phelps (SEMIFINAL SESSION) at the 2008 Beijing Olympics (Source: Yahoo Olympics)
Milorad Cavic beats everybody, including* Michael Phelps (MEDALS SESSION) at the 2008 Beijing Olympics (Source: NBC)
Photo finish freeze frame at the finals session speaks volumes. (Photo: Heinz Kluetmeier/SI)
OMEGA is the official sponsor of Michael Phelps since 2004. (Source: OmegaWatches.com)
What is that mysterious OMEGA BLACK BOX? And why does OMEGA use the word compromising in the same sentence? (Source: OmegaWatches.com)
Michael Phelps in an OMEGA sponsored lane at the finish line next to Milorad Cavic. (Source: Michael Kappeler/AFP/Getty Images, August 16)
Global head of sponsorship management for VISA Inc.: The objective of Phelps\' sponsors is to expand Michael\'s presence in other markets. (Source: Washington Post, August 18)
The greatest whatever athlete of all-time can\'t bear to look the truth in the eyes. (Source: unknown)
To the naked eye it appeared to be either a dead heat or a Cavic victory. (Source: San Jose Mercury News, August 16)
Replays of Phelps\'s finish compared with Cavic\'s appeared to show Cavic reached the wall ahead of his American rival. (Source: Globe and Mail, August 16)
To the naked eye, Phelps surely lost. (Source: AOL Sports, August 16)
FINA official cheers for Phelps and promises: (Phelps) would have won the race no matter what. (No matter what!? I mean WHAT THE HECK IS THAT SUPPOSED TO MEAN???)(Source: San Francisco Chronicle, August 16)
FINA official swimming rules for Butterfly races state the requirement of both hands simultaneously touching the pad (Source: FINA.org, August 16)
As per those same FINA rules, Phelps\' hands are clearly NOT touching the pad simultaneously. (Source: Michael Kappeler/AFP/Getty Images, August 16)
FINA official refuses to release the conclusive evidence of Phelps\' win, and states the following: We are not going to distribute footage. We are not doing these kinds of things. Everything is good. (Source: New York Times, August 16)
FINA Vice President, Dale Neuburger: I\'ve worked with his (Phelps\') agent, Peter Carlisle, from Octagon on numerous occasions. We\'re working right now in trying to help Michael have a post-Olympic tour. I\'ve known him, his family. (Source: Indianapolis Star, August 17)
Jay Mariotti: Let\'s make something clear: It wouldn\'t have been good for sport, swimming or anyone but Cavic had Phelps lost. Losing his final individual race would have been one of the great letdowns in sports history. (Source: Chicago Sun-Times, August 16)
Cavic: If we got to do this again, I would win it. (Source: LA Times, August 16)
F.A.Q. (updated August 21)
- We\'ve received hundreds of emails in the past two days. In order to clear at least some confusion about this site and our motives for creating it we decided to put up this section and answer some of your comments and questions:
1. Couple of you commented that 001ofasecond.com name is a misleading since 001 represents 1000th of a second, and not one 100th as implied. We registered 001ofasecond.com on August 16, just a few hours after that charade in the Water Cube. Our original aim was for 001 to represent 0.01 of a second, since it\'s impossible to register a domain name with a dot (.) in it. We could have used subdomain and make it 0.01ofasecond.com, but that would have been confusing for others even more. For the sake of pedantic clarity we have now decided to register and also run 100thofasecond.com and clear any and all confusion. So as of August 20, 001ofasecond.com will forward to 100thofasecond.com, and therefore we ask you to visit and link to 100thofasecond.com as a main source for the 2008 Michael Phelps\' Beijing Olympic conspiracy theory. So please adjust your habits and links accordingly.
2. Too many Phelps\' fans emailed us and offered us the same Sports Illustrated sequence photos as a definitive proof of Phelps\' win, YET none of you commented about that simultaneous two-hands touchpad FINA rule? In any case, we are aware of those Sports Illustrated sequence photos, but we feel that they are inconclusive other than the fact that Phelps\' left hand was nowhere near the touchpad. In addition to that, you may or may not know but Sports Illustrated magazine last issue (August 18) featured Michael Phelps on its cover, using dreamy superlatives like \'AMAZING\' and \'KING\' to describe him. Not surprisingly, Sports Illustrated next issue (August 21) will also feature Michael Phelps on its cover. For that reason please forgive us if we don\'t take Sports Illustrated sequence photos as a \'foolproof\' evidence of anything other than Sports Illustrated reliance on the worship of Michael Phelps for their own financial gains. Again, we are coming back to the conflict of interest issue. We can\'t in our good conscience, and as a matter of moral and philosophical principle, believe in the set of photos that are published in the source that makes so much money off of Michael Phelps\' name, fame and likeness. That would be akin to unquestionably believing the vice-president Prick Chainy and his version of the events in Iraq, while knowing that his company Haliburton was given billions worth of U.S. government contracts in Iraq without any normal bidding process whatsoever. I hope you understand and accept that point.
3. Many of you commented that we shouldn\'t have posted Cavic\'s result from qualifying and semifinal races, because those races \'don\'t mean a thing\'. The only race that means is a final race. Well, we disagree. By posting that Cavic was superior to everyone in two races prior to the final race we have established a pattern of his success. We have established that, in fact, Cavic was the favorite in the final race, despite the fact that very few people ever heard of him. By establishing that he was a favorite, we have also established that him leading the whole final race was not a surprise. He was not just some guy who unexpectedly run the race of his life, but somebody who was just doing his job, by being the best, even when having the ever mighty Phelps next to him.
4. We put that particular freeze frame photo in order to highlight the difference in hands\' position of the two swimmers. Cavic\'s hands are perhaps about 10 inches (25 cm) away from the sensor, while Phelps\' hands are perhaps about six feet away (180 cm). Even if we account for the fact that Cavic was gliding, and Phelps was \'flying\' through the air, the difference, particularly at the finish, was huge. Should have been huge. Should have been enough. But apparently it wasn\'t. Why?
5. Cavic graciously admitted defeat? We don\'t know why Cavic chose to remain quiet. He knew that under those circumstances nobody was about to question and/or strip Phelps\' off of his gold medal. Knowing that Cavic lives and trains in the U.S. we are probably not far off if we say that he was afraid of being labeled \'ungracious looser\' by the U.S. swimming community, and the U.S. public at large. Cavic is not stupid. He also knows that his future livelihood is tied to those two. He also knows that FINA, if they wanted to, can make him \'disappear\' by disqualifying him for any number of made-up reasons. He also knows that Phelps\', with his rich sponsors, money and fame, is an all-powerful beast that is not to be messed around with. Why ruin the NBC Olympic saga, why deflate American kids\' dreams (that they too one day can win nine, or even 19 gold medals) why spoil the good life and Phelps\' moment in the historic spotlight for some gold medal that wouldn\'t have been nearly worth it, as much as silver medal is. Cavic is a smart man. For him silver shines brighter than gold, if you know what we mean.
Finally, we would also like to offer the following commentary:
We can debate who really won in Beijing that day until we are blue in the face but in the absence of conclusive proof from FINA that will get us nowhere. But we can\'t debate the following facts, because these are known facts that can\'t be disputed:
Counting all three races, Milorad Cavic was the fastest 100-meter Butterfly swimmer at the 2008 Beijing Olympics. The \'naked eyes\' of the whole world (including Phelps\' coach and Phelps\' mother) saw and thought that Cavic won the final 100-meter Butterfly race. Only OMEGA sensors \'saw\' Phelps\' win. OMEGA the official timekeeper of the event is the main corporate sponsor of Michael Phelps. FINA officials cheered for Phelps, wanted him to win. FINA officials refused to provide high-speed video evidence of Phelps\' win (what are they hiding?) Too many rich and powerful U.S. corporations had interest in seeing (and perhaps making sure?) that Phelps\' broke Spitz\' record. Too many people worldwide wanted Phelps\' to win. Michael Phelps\' is a fat golden goose whose diamond-encrusted egg$ are tickled and fondled by the whole world.
Milorad Cavic never stood a chance.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have any further evidence or quotes related to this case that you\'d like to see posted here, please e-mail us:
conspiracy AT 100thofasecond .com
This conspiracy theory has been visited 170,657 times in the past 1.47 days.
This theory is also work in progress. Please check back frequently for the latest updates. © 2008
來自圈子：天津圈 (702 人)
圈子描述：搜狐·天津第一博客圈
圈子標簽：天津 搜狐 圈子 聚會 博客圈主：椰棲
副圈主：stacy07誰家的曉誰~~藍～～♂帥→戀♀
共0頁 | 上一頁 1 下一頁[天津奧運]菲天王 第七金有假？ 0/?
分享標簽: 世界日報日誌原文：http://michellecai.blog.sohu.com/97889571.html
隻因他是菲爾普斯，理所當然由他奪金？
「飛魚」菲爾普斯在北京奧運破紀錄奪下八金，成了轟動全球的大事，不過他在100公尺蝶式決賽，隻以0.01秒險勝塞爾維亞好手卡維奇，至今爭論不休，甚至出現陰謀論，有人誇張認為，菲爾普斯這一金有如「誰殺了甘乃迪」，將成曆史懸案。
菲爾普斯上周六以大會計時器最小差距擊敗卡維奇，追平「水怪」史畢茲單屆七金紀錄，最近幾天風波不斷，就連負責京奧官方計時的歐米茄，也遭池魚之殃，隻因菲爾普斯是產品代言人，在真相沒有水落石出前，隻能啞巴吃黃連。
取得京奧美國轉播權的NBC電視台，就此事開始扒糞，以高清晰畫麵分析，菲爾普斯在終點前觸壁，確實晚了卡維奇一步，紐約時報也強調，京奧官方迄今未提供任何判定勝敗的影像，最終結果仍無定論。
有個就叫「百分之一秒」（http://001ofasecond.com）的網站，秀出100蝶式終點前的水中照片，大膽推測這是陰謀論，隻因菲爾普斯是最熱門的奪金人選，全球媒體都希望他追平史畢茲的紀錄，在差距幾乎未能判定的情況下，「當然」是菲爾普斯勝出。
菲爾普斯在100蝶式準決賽遊出50秒97，落後卡維奇的50秒92，到了決賽遊完前50公尺，更是落居第七，輸給暫居榜首的卡維奇，直到終點前才決定勝負，當時媒體還說：「卡維奇輸在手臂太短。」
「百分之一秒」認為，菲爾普斯雖拉近差距，仍無法超前卡維奇，現場泳迷、全球電視機前的觀眾、不同角度的重播鏡頭（包括水中），都看得很清楚，就是卡維奇獲勝。
「百分之一秒」還說，電視鏡頭帶到菲爾普斯的教練包曼，他已喃喃自語說：「卡維奇贏了。」
坐在觀眾席上的菲媽，比出兩根手指頭，接受寶貝兒子屈居銀牌的事實，就連菲爾普斯在賽後幾秒鍾，也似乎了解自己輸掉這一仗。這一切就在大會計時器亮出50秒58、50秒59後，曆史改變了。
搜狐博客 > Michelle的部落格 > 日誌 2008-08-22 | 菲天王 第七金有假？ 標簽： 世界日報
隻因他是菲爾普斯，理所當然由他奪金？
「飛魚」菲爾普斯在北京奧運破紀錄奪下八金，成了轟動全球的大事，不過他在100公尺蝶式決賽，隻以0.01秒險勝塞爾維亞好手卡維奇，至今爭論不休，甚至出現陰謀論，有人誇張認為，菲爾普斯這一金有如「誰殺了甘乃迪」，將成曆史懸案。
菲爾普斯上周六以大會計時器最小差距擊敗卡維奇，追平「水怪」史畢茲單屆七金紀錄，最近幾天風波不斷，就連負責京奧官方計時的歐米茄，也遭池魚之殃，隻因菲爾普斯是產品代言人，在真相沒有水落石出前，隻能啞巴吃黃連。
取得京奧美國轉播權的NBC電視台，就此事開始扒糞，以高清晰畫麵分析，菲爾普斯在終點前觸壁，確實晚了卡維奇一步，紐約時報也強調，京奧官方迄今未提供任何判定勝敗的影像，最終結果仍無定論。
有個就叫「百分之一秒」（http://001ofasecond.com）的網站，秀出100蝶式終點前的水中照片，大膽推測這是陰謀論，隻因菲爾普斯是最熱門的奪金人選，全球媒體都希望他追平史畢茲的紀錄，在差距幾乎未能判定的情況下，「當然」是菲爾普斯勝出。
菲爾普斯在100蝶式準決賽遊出50秒97，落後卡維奇的50秒92，到了決賽遊完前50公尺，更是落居第七，輸給暫居榜首的卡維奇，直到終點前才決定勝負，當時媒體還說：「卡維奇輸在手臂太短。」
「百分之一秒」認為，菲爾普斯雖拉近差距，仍無法超前卡維奇，現場泳迷、全球電視機前的觀眾、不同角度的重播鏡頭（包括水中），都看得很清楚，就是卡維奇獲勝。
「百分之一秒」還說，電視鏡頭帶到菲爾普斯的教練包曼，他已喃喃自語說：「卡維奇贏了。」
坐在觀眾席上的菲媽，比出兩根手指頭，接受寶貝兒子屈居銀牌的事實，就連菲爾普斯在賽後幾秒鍾，也似乎了解自己輸掉這一仗。這一切就在大會計時器亮出50秒58、50秒59後，曆史改變了。
儀器誤差？成績造假？碰觸誤差？＞＞
菲爾普斯第七金 爆爭議!
由 nethome 於1天17小時前貼文
「造假」，成了北京奧運開幕式最大話題，然而在賽場本屆奧運最大兩項成就，美國菲爾普斯泳奪8金，及牙買加柏特百米挺進9秒70內人類新裏程，均被媒體質疑有「造假」之嫌。 誰的手先碰壁？NBC解析畫麵提質疑 美國遊泳「金童」菲爾普斯打破前輩「水怪」史畢茲7金紀錄，且成就個人累計奧運14金奧運史上最偉大紀錄，這兩項成就都足以使他留名千古，但美國媒體重新檢視這段歷程，發現在男子100蝶式菲爾普斯以0.01秒之差打敗塞爾維亞查維奇這場比賽有問題。
新聞 運動 費爾普斯 北京奧運 遊泳 終點計時器 攝影角度 感應靈敏度
北美首頁 │ 全球新聞 │ 大陸新聞 │ 財經 │ 娛樂 │ 奧運 │ 移民 │ 雜誌 │ 書籍 │ 圖片 │ 論壇
全球新聞 > 時事 > 美國 > 正文繁體 | 簡體費爾普斯第七金 爆爭議
http://news.sina.com 2008年08月21日 01:52 中國日報
誰的手先碰壁？NBC解析畫麵提質疑
（紐約十九日電）本屆北京奧運最大兩項成就，美國費爾普斯泳奪8金，及牙買加柏特百米挺進9秒70內人類新裏程，均被媒體質疑有「造假」之嫌。
NBC報導，美國遊泳「金童」費爾普斯打破前輩「水怪」史畢茲7金紀錄，且成就個人累計奧運14金奧運史上最偉大紀錄，這兩項成就都足以使他留名千古，但美國媒體重新檢視這段歷程，發現在男子100蝶式菲爾普斯以0.01秒之差打敗塞爾維亞查維奇這場比賽有問題。
這場激烈比賽，費爾普斯僅以0.01秒勝出，經過一般正常影像錄影，肉眼是絕對看不出這樣差距，然而負責電視轉播的美國NBC電視台，經過高清晰畫麵解析，認為在費爾普斯碰壁前，查維奇已經先碰到，他們還提供水下攝影的片段，質疑費爾普斯並非金牌得主，而這段影像也已在網路上流傳。
美國紐約時報記者還發表文章指出，「雖官方同意將當時判定勝負的影像公佈，但至今還沒有看到任何一張，可以証明費爾普斯率先碰壁的高清晰照片。一般電視攝影機隻能拍到1秒25至30幅畫麵，這場比賽隻有0.01秒，很難証明誰勝誰負，因此最終的結果仍是問號。」
百米飛人吃藥？柏特含金量也被懷疑
除了費爾普斯之外，德國媒體則是點名打破百米世界紀錄的「牙買加飛人」柏特，懷疑他有使用禁藥之嫌，對於德國媒體的說法，國際奧會官方並未有任何柏特有使用禁藥證據。德國「圖片報」報導指出，連同牙買加贏得女子百米金牌，為何世界上跑得最快的人都來自這隻有300萬人口小國？他們有何種特殊訓練方式，能培育出世界最快飛人，「這一勝真實性，究竟能有多少呢？」
柏特父親特別出麵說，自己兒子能跑得這麼快，是食用當地生長一種山藥所熬成的湯，這種湯在自己國家是日常主食。不過，這種說法並不能使質疑者信服。
一名興奮劑製造商，接受採訪時說，「10秒與9.7秒的差距，就在於使用興奮劑。」這名受訪者並強調，有超過20種興奮劑是檢查不出來的，且牙買加並非加勒比海反興奮劑組織成員，因此不受約束。
【去論壇發表評論】【轉寄】【列印】
菲爾普斯第七金 爆爭議 瀏覽67｜回應0｜推薦0
2008/08/20 18:08:53
【聯合晚報╱記者王樹衡／綜合報導】
「造假」，成了北京奧運開幕式最大話題，然而在賽場本屆奧運最大兩項成就，美國菲爾普斯泳奪8金，及牙買加柏特百米挺進9秒70內人類新裏程，均被媒體質疑有「造假」之嫌。
誰的手先碰壁？NBC解析畫麵提質疑
美國遊泳「金童」菲爾普斯打破前輩「水怪」史畢茲7金紀錄，且成就個人累計奧運14金奧運史上最偉大紀錄，這兩項成就都足以使他留名千古，但美國媒體重新檢視這段歷程，發現在男子100蝶式菲爾普斯以0.01秒之差打敗塞爾維亞查維奇這場比賽有問題。
這場激烈比賽，菲爾普斯僅以0.01秒勝出，經過一般正常影像錄影，肉眼是絕對看不出這樣差距，然而負責電視轉播的美國NBC電視台，經過高清晰畫麵解析，認為在菲爾普斯碰壁前，查維奇已經先碰到，他們還提供水下攝影的片段，質疑菲爾普斯並非金牌得主，而這段影像也已在網路上流傳。
美國紐約時報記者還發表文章指出，「雖官方同意將當時判定勝負的影像公布，但至今還沒有看到任何一張，可以證明菲爾普斯率先碰壁的高清晰照片。一般電視攝影機隻能拍到1秒25至30幅畫麵，這場比賽隻有0.01秒，很難證明誰勝誰負，因此最終的結果仍是問號。」
百米飛人吃藥？柏特含金量也被懷疑
除了菲爾普斯之外，德國媒體則是點名打破百米世界紀錄的「牙買加飛人」柏特，懷疑他有使用禁藥之嫌，對於德國媒體的說法，國際奧會官方並未有任何柏特有使用禁藥證據。德國「圖片報」報導指出，連同牙買加贏得女子百米金牌，為何世界上跑得最快的人都來自這隻有300萬人口小國？他們有何種特殊訓練方式，能培育出世界最快飛人，「這一勝真實性，究竟能有多少呢？」
柏特父親特別出麵說，自己兒子能跑得這麼快，是食用當地生長一種山藥所熬成的湯，這種湯在自己國家是日常主食。不過，這種說法並不能使質疑者信服。
一名興奮劑製造商，接受採訪時說，「10秒與9.7秒的差距，就在於使用興奮劑。」這名受訪者並強調，有超過20種興奮劑是檢查不出來的，且牙買加並非加勒比海反興奮劑組織成員，因此不受約束。
【2008/08/20 聯合晚報】
國際泳聯回放錄像強調菲爾普斯第七金沒問題
作者：xiao.ql2008 時間： 2008-08-16 14:29:16 0 位TOM網友發表了評論50 位TOM網友頂過42 位TOM網友踩過中新社北京八月十六日電(記者 高凱)百米蝶泳果真成了菲爾普斯“八金夢”中的一個特例，雖然最終奪金，但百分之一秒的優勢微弱到肉眼難辨。針對獲得銀牌的塞爾維亞代表團賽後對成績提出的正式申訴，國際泳聯確認，奧運會計時係統沒有任何問題，菲爾普斯也完全不必擔心已經到手的金牌。
百米蝶泳較量一直被認作菲爾普斯此番奧運五個個人項目中最“懸”的一個，今天的比賽再度印證了這一點。幾乎在全程都看不出任何優勢的菲爾普斯憑借最後關頭的衝刺追上塞爾維亞選手查維奇，二人幾乎同時觸壁，在場的人們全都難分伯仲，依靠計時器的指示才得知“神童”幸運地快了百分之一秒。
然而就在頒獎儀式結束後半小時，國際泳聯在此間召開了新聞發布會，表示已經在賽後收到一位塞爾維亞遊泳隊官員書麵遞交的申訴，認為菲爾普斯實際上並未先於查維奇觸壁。國際泳聯技術官員本.埃庫姆博說：“我們在每次比賽前都會檢查計時係統，今天也是如此，事實證明這套係統是完全準確的。可以信賴的。此外我們也逐格回放了比賽錄像，很明顯塞爾維亞選手查維奇是在菲爾普斯之後第二個觸壁的。”
埃庫姆博表示，“為了向塞爾維亞證明這一點，我們特別允許他們派代表觀看了隻有泳聯官員才能觀看的非常精確的特別錄像回放，塞爾維亞方麵在此後也認定菲爾普斯確實更早觸壁，他們現在已經撤回了申訴。”
對此菲爾普斯表示：“我不知道有人提出申訴，說實在的，今天的金牌很驚險，我自己也分不清是不是自己最先觸壁，最後關頭我隻知道我並不落後，並且拚盡了全力。”
確保今日金牌後，在北京奧運會已經奪得七枚金牌的菲爾普斯已經追平了施皮茨一屆奧運會個人金牌收獲數量的世界紀錄。
到第 1 頁 我知道更多，點擊發布 >>
評論
博主已隱藏評論
博主已關閉評論
