征求你的觀點：如何在工作中處理爭論

如果在一個TEAM MEETING 中出現爭論，某某人以大於平常2倍的聲音向你“呐喊”，你會怎麽辦？（前提，你認為你是正確的）
1. 某某是你的頂頭上司
2. 某某是你的上司的上司
3. 某某是你的平級，是你的競爭對手
4. 某某是你的下級
5. 某某是你的頂頭上司的同級，是你的上司的競爭對手

回複by CATHY_BAY：
1. 某某是你的頂頭上司: never happened. always have agreement with my boss beforehand
2. 某某是你的上司的上司: happens all the time. yell back if I am certain I am right. He always smiles when I shout back. The prerequisite is that he knows I am not a very calculative person.
3. 某某是你的平級，是你的競爭對手: calmly fight back, with good reasoning and suggestions. Make sure boss sees that I am trying to be collaborative and constructive.
4. 某某是你的下級: say we will address this afterwards. let's move on for now. But this never happens to me. My reports know they can't win arguments with me.
5. 某某是你的頂頭上司的同級，是你的上司的競爭對手: sarcastic and ridicule the person severely. There is no reserve here.
其它回複：
Keep calm. -jill08- ♀   (0 bytes) (8 reads) 2/24/09 

• 不跟上司喊的給他留點麵子 -快笨死了- ♀   (44 bytes) (47 reads) 2/24/09

• 不爭論，委婉提出意見和看法就行了。如果沒有明白人，就更不要去 -貪玩- ♂   (350 bytes) (90 reads) 2/24/09

• 為什麽我們不能像本土人一樣理直氣壯的爭論？ -百萬富翁- ♂   (0 bytes) (13 reads) 2/24/09

• 聰明的本土人也不理直氣壯的爭論！ -快笨死了- ♀   (0 bytes) (15 reads) 2/24/09

• 頂！！！聰明的本土人也不理直氣壯的爭論！ -貪玩- ♂   (0 bytes) (14 reads) 2/24/09

• 其實爭論不爭論隻要掌握好尺度 -快笨死了- ♀   (0 bytes) (8 reads) 2/24/09

• 我們這麽聰明，但是我們還是沒有自信？WHY? -百萬富翁- ♂   (0 bytes) (9 reads) 2/24/09

• 嗬嗬，不爭論，才正是有自信，有智慧的表現。 -貪玩- ♂   (0 bytes) (6 reads) 2/24/09

• different scenarios -Cathy_Bay- ♀   (738 bytes) (251 reads) 2/24/09

• 一看就是SEASONED VETERAN，不錯，全盤收下，珍藏 -百萬富翁- ♂   (0 bytes) (4 reads) 2/24/09

• agree... she does have strategy... usually i just yell wheneve -pega- ♀   (0 bytes) (5 reads) 2/25/09

• usually i just yell whenever i feel like it -pega- ♀   (0 bytes) (3 reads) 2/25/09

• who actually yelled at you to trigger this post? -Cathy_Bay- ♀   (0 bytes) (33 reads) 2/24/09

• I got yelled at very often, I do yell back occasionally -百萬富翁- ♂   (0 bytes) (5 reads) 2/24/09

• haha. guess we are the same type. -Cathy_Bay- ♀   (0 bytes) (12 reads) 2/24/09

• 不管他是誰 , 你得心平氣和地把你的觀點說清楚 -interested1-   (0 bytes) (6 reads) 2/24/09

• 大家看看Cathy_Bay的回貼吧，很有水平！ -百萬富翁- ♂   (0 bytes) (20 reads) 2/24/09

• 溫柔的強者，有理由有權利爭論時選擇不爭論 -布衣之才- ♂   (0 bytes) (8 reads) 2/24/09

• 值得爭麽？爭之何益不爭何損？不爭即爭反之亦反 -看那月光- ♀   (0 bytes) (4 reads) 2/24/09

• I think we are talking about 2 questions here -Cathy_Bay- ♀   (486 bytes) (48 reads) 2/25/09

• 對，我的問題是如何對付別人對你“YELLING" -百萬富翁- ♂   (0 bytes) (2 reads) 2/25/09

• 爭論當然應該，而且必要。注意要處理得專業，不要針對人 -怪哉- ♂   (0 bytes) (7 reads) 2/25/09

• 這個觀點我同意。盡量做到不針對人，至少表麵上不針對人 -百萬富翁- ♂   (0 bytes) (2

 提上來說處理爭論 -看那月光- ♀    (409 bytes) (253 reads) 2/24/09 

•  嗬嗬，若你已強過他，所爭為何？若你不如他，爭之何用？ -吳用先生- ♂    (0 bytes) (11 reads) 2/24/09

•  說得真好~~ -雲河- ♀    (0 bytes) (3 reads) 2/25/09

•  回複：嗬嗬，若你已強過他，所爭為何？right. 若你不如他，爭之何用? -Cathy_Bay- ♀    (592 bytes) (19 reads) 2/25/09

•  yes, but argue in an unemotional way. being able to -pega- ♀    (73 bytes) (10 reads) 2/25/09

•  "argue" deos not mean "yell". -Cathy_Bay- ♀    (114 bytes) (6 reads) 2/25/09

•  And that's american way. If you don't like it -百萬富翁- ♂    (47 bytes) (2 reads) 2/25/09

•  要爭論，必須爭論。我這人工作沒有爭論就沒勁 -怪哉- ♂    (66 bytes) (26 reads) 2/25/09

•  當然，不能什麽都爭，小事不重要的事就不用爭了 -怪哉- ♂    (12 bytes) (11 reads) 2/25/09

•  我去麵試的時候，如果下麵沒人跟我唱對台，我就弄不好 -怪哉- ♂    (48 bytes) (18 reads) 2/25/09

•  exactly. more questions i got, more excited I would be -Cathy_Bay- ♀    (24 bytes) (11 reads) 2/25/09

•  In some case, you have to lose the arguement -百萬富翁- ♂    (151 bytes) (1 reads) 2/25/09

•  absolutely. -Cathy_Bay- ♀    (318 bytes) (0 reads) 2/25/09

•  回複：提上來說處理爭論 -sub101- ♂    (309 bytes) (23 reads) 2/25/09

•  As fellow chinese， we have a lot to learn how to argue -百萬富翁- ♂    (12 bytes) (1 reads) 2/25/09

•  seems liek most people enjoy argument otherwise why 提上來說處理 -Cathy_Bay-