WSJ 下麵評論的正常人多一些

來源: YodaKush 於 2025-10-02 03:15:02 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 閱讀數 : (1540 bytes)
本帖於 2025-10-02 03:38:24 時間, 由普通用戶 YodaKush 編輯

"Those all sound like excellent ideas. How can anyone disagree with those?

"All the free ride students must be funded by someone else."

The proposed concept is quite clear. The schools are free to 'go their own way' - just not with federal dollars. Makes a whole lot of sense.

所有跟帖： 

• WSJ的評論比較理智，NYT下麵的品論基本是whining -bigcat2026- ♂ 給 bigcat2026 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/03/2025 postreply 21:51:17

請您先登陸，再發跟帖！