PhD Graduate student admissions paused and cut back

"Right now, it looks very likely that there will be major cuts to pretty much all PhD and MD/PhD programs. It looks like there will be massive cuts to NSF and possibly the overall NIH budget, but the biggest bomb is the cuts to indirect. This will cause cuts to administrative staff and cores and maintenance, but there will also be many fewer students being accepted. Universities are implementing a variety of plans to recoup lost indirect from the direct side of grants. For example, one university I'm familiar with will be charging rent, and another is going to shift some PI salary to direct (that previously wasn't charged to the grant). In either case, a grant that previously paid for 3 grad students will now only pay for 2. Since that starts immediately, PIs are scrambling to figure out how to pay for the students they already have. They aren't going to take any new ones until they can figure out how to pay for the students who are already there.

If the indirect cuts get reversed by the courts, and the administration abides by the court decision, then the field is probably just looking at cuts to the overall budgets of NSF and NIH (and other science agencies). In this case, one might expect 25-50% cuts to new student admissions.

If the indirect cuts do not get reversed, many universities will be scrambling to limit admissions this year (possibly rescinding offers) and they will not take any new students next year as they figure out how to pay for existing students. In the future, PIs will ask for more direct funds to compensate for rent and other upcharges, which will mean fewer total grants being funded and fewer students."

 

https://www.statnews.com/2025/02/19/trump-funding-freeze-grad-student-postdoc-acceptances-paused-nih-research/

所有跟帖: 

很多學校開始review tenured professor了。 -katies- 給 katies 發送悄悄話 (111 bytes) () 03/14/2025 postreply 11:24:43

如果Tenured Professor都危險了,在讀的PhD,如果老板走人了,PdD學生怎麽辦,特別是讀了3,4年的。 -haoren3- 給 haoren3 發送悄悄話 (59 bytes) () 03/14/2025 postreply 11:26:38

一般沒有funding的professor是沒有phd student的。 -katies- 給 katies 發送悄悄話 (94 bytes) () 03/14/2025 postreply 11:29:20

以前沒有funding,可以做TA,老板走人,學生咋辦? -haoren3- 給 haoren3 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/14/2025 postreply 11:31:14

美國整體IQ快樂向下,PhD是反潮流的 -skyport- 給 skyport 發送悄悄話 skyport 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/14/2025 postreply 11:25:36

+1 -Lucky2022- 給 Lucky2022 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/14/2025 postreply 11:43:11

1910年的美國智商比今天估計低,還不是一個勝利接著一個勝利 -XYZ3- 給 XYZ3 發送悄悄話 XYZ3 的博客首頁 (96 bytes) () 03/14/2025 postreply 11:35:57

智商越低越好啊,容易管理 -skyport- 給 skyport 發送悄悄話 skyport 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/14/2025 postreply 11:38:10

又蠢又壞也難對付啊 -whaled- 給 whaled 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/14/2025 postreply 11:52:26

那倒是,不過好像美國選民主要是蠢,嘿嘿 -skyport- 給 skyport 發送悄悄話 skyport 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/14/2025 postreply 11:54:39

你說反了,記得曾經查過,美國平均智商比過去下降了,還降了不少。現在大學教授很多都說,現在的學生不如過去。 -trimtip- 給 trimtip 發送悄悄話 (425 bytes) () 03/14/2025 postreply 11:40:27

現在的教授不應該更快樂嗎?學生IQ越低越好管理,Lol -JackEasy- 給 JackEasy 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/14/2025 postreply 11:50:48

這……不好教? -成功的兔- 給 成功的兔 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/14/2025 postreply 11:52:28

彼此彼此,左學校左教授,哈哈哈照樣”日後提撥”。美國不需講IQ己經十幾年了。Lol -JackEasy- 給 JackEasy 發送悄悄話 (24 bytes) () 03/14/2025 postreply 12:06:13

都快樂都快樂,金色時代來臨了麽LOL -skyport- 給 skyport 發送悄悄話 skyport 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/14/2025 postreply 11:53:59

或許1910年的美國人比今天更有raw talent -XYZ3- 給 XYZ3 發送悄悄話 XYZ3 的博客首頁 (175 bytes) () 03/14/2025 postreply 11:54:51

現在的發明創造對知識要求較高,比如量子計算機,不懂量子物理很難明白量子計算機,過去的發明現在看都是很初級的知識,再往前看 -trimtip- 給 trimtip 發送悄悄話 (320 bytes) () 03/14/2025 postreply 12:02:17

修正一下我上麵說的,1910年美國人平均學曆大概比英法德低 -XYZ3- 給 XYZ3 發送悄悄話 XYZ3 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 03/14/2025 postreply 12:03:23

American IQs rose 30 points in the last century. Now, they m -baydad- 給 baydad 發送悄悄話 (377 bytes) () 03/14/2025 postreply 12:00:09

九斤老太。 -baydad- 給 baydad 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 03/14/2025 postreply 12:01:04

一流之下的PhD Program很早之前就全部第三世界了。多少年來年輕人不被鼓勵研究做學問。 -無言無語無聲- 給 無言無語無聲 發送悄悄話 (57 bytes) () 03/14/2025 postreply 12:08:29

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!