難補滅是的。但你應該去查一下哪些車起火更容易。

本帖於 2024-12-01 06:09:00 時間, 由普通用戶 曲藝 編輯

別跟我提化學,我高中是我班化學科代表嗬嗬,化學一般是前幾名,不是我喜歡而是化學老師喜歡我我不好意思不學

Kelly Blue Book reported on findings from a study that shows EV are actually less likely to cause or be involved in fires than gasoline-powered or hybrid vehicles.1 Data from the National Transportation Safety Board showed that EVs were involved in approximately 25 fires for every 100,000 sold.  Comparatively, approximately 1,530 gasoline-powered vehicles and 3,475 hybrid vehicles were involved in fires for every 100,000 sold.

Reporting from other countries supports the assertion that EVs are less fire-prone than gas-powered vehicles.2 Data from Norway, Sweden, and Australia is consistent with findings in the U.S., showing that the prevalence of EV fires remains relatively low.

So why the concern? There are two main reasons, according to those who have looked at the issue:

  1. Because EVs are still relatively novel, media may have a tendency to highlight fires that involve lithium-ion batteries.3Increased media coverage can lead to a public perception of increased risk, even when the opposite is true. 
  2. While EV fires are not as common as gas-powered vehicle fires, they are more difficult to extinguish, due to how the batteries are protected from the elements.4 Batteries take a long time to cool, creating a risk of reignition, so EVs that have caught on fire must be handled differently. The battery chemistry itself also poses challenges to firefighters during extinguishment.
請您先登陸,再發跟帖!