加州禁止私立非盈利性大學招生實行legacy和donor preference

California bans legacy and donor preferences in admissions at private, nonprofit universities

What you need to know: Governor Newsom signed legislation today prohibiting California’s private nonprofit colleges from considering legacy and donor preferences in college admissions.

Sacramento, California – Governor Gavin Newsom today announced that he has signed AB 1780 by Assemblymember Phil Ting (D-San Francisco) to prohibit legacy and donor preferences in the admissions process for private, nonprofit institutions. Legacy status and donor preferences have long been excluded from the state’s public university admissions process. The University of California system eliminated legacy preferences in 1998.

“In California, everyone should be able to get ahead through merit, skill, and hard work. The California Dream shouldn’t be accessible to just a lucky few, which is why we’re opening the door to higher education wide enough for everyone, fairly.”

Governor Gavin Newsom

The U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling last summer restricting the use of race in college admissions. In light of this shift, proponents of AB 1780 advocated for admissions criteria that additionally ensure that factors like wealth or personal relationships do not unduly influence admissions decisions. AB 1780 aims to ensure that admissions decisions are based on merit rather than personal connections — reducing biases in the admissions process at private colleges in California. 

Under the new law, all private colleges and universities in the state must submit an annual report to disclose compliance. 

Assemblymember Phil Ting: “If we value diversity in higher education, we must level the playing field. That means making the college application process more fair and equitable. Hard work, good grades and a well-rounded background should earn you a spot in the incoming class – not the size of the check your family can write or who you’re related to. I thank the Governor for agreeing with me and supporters of AB 1780 – that every student deserves a fair shot at their dream school.”

所有跟帖: 

加州很有意思:他們最早取締AA,現在又最早取締legacy和donor preference -whaled- 給 whaled 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/30/2024 postreply 16:28:37

窯洞會不會遷都,東進? -土無垠- 給 土無垠 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/30/2024 postreply 16:28:27

怎麽會離開那個大金礦? -whaled- 給 whaled 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/30/2024 postreply 16:29:27

暗箱操作,禁止不了。如果不是純考試,merit based,錄取一般都是換湯不換藥。 -Pilsung- 給 Pilsung 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/30/2024 postreply 16:33:32

那行不通,變成高考了。不過取消一個特權是一個,一步步來。 -whaled- 給 whaled 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/30/2024 postreply 16:35:43

你覺得純考試真的靈光麽 -jingzhumama- 給 jingzhumama 發送悄悄話 jingzhumama 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 09/30/2024 postreply 16:40:28

當然不行。不想孩子成為考試機器。但是我覺得哈佛的篩選還算合理,孩子們優秀的多樣性有所展現。 -Pilsung- 給 Pilsung 發送悄悄話 (149 bytes) () 09/30/2024 postreply 16:47:52

那藝術音樂寫作的比賽都不能量化, 咋辦 -jingzhumama- 給 jingzhumama 發送悄悄話 jingzhumama 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 09/30/2024 postreply 16:55:54

美國好學校很多。其實隻要自己努力,去哪家都行。 -成功的夢- 給 成功的夢 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/30/2024 postreply 16:33:55

反正是holistic。換個角度holistic就行了 -Bailey4321- 給 Bailey4321 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/30/2024 postreply 16:34:04

no specific punishment for universities violating it 搞笑嗎? -STEMkid- 給 STEMkid 發送悄悄話 (298 bytes) () 09/30/2024 postreply 16:34:06

還會形成輿論壓力,麵子不好看,我覺得學校會盡量避免上榜。 -whaled- 給 whaled 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/30/2024 postreply 16:38:23

這個和建牆類似,肯定不可能完全杜絕,但讓犯規的多些障礙多些後顧之憂,也好嘛。 -大西洋裏來的人- 給 大西洋裏來的人 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 09/30/2024 postreply 16:50:15

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!