據新出爐研究說,40萬藤畢業生數據,體育娃終身收入高3.3%,大概20萬,這是對亞裔不友好的研究結果

來源: mjnew 2023-10-20 14:05:18 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (2263 bytes)
本文內容已被 [ mjnew ] 在 2023-10-20 19:08:12 編輯過。如有問題,請報告版主或論壇管理刪除.

https://www.nber.org/papers/w31753

 

No Revenge for Nerds? Evaluating the Careers of Ivy League Athletes

This paper compares the careers of Ivy League athletes to those of their non-athlete classmates. Combining team-level information on all Ivy League athletes from 1970 to 2021 with resume data for all Ivy League graduates, we examine both post-graduate education and career choices as well as career outcomes. In terms of industry choice, athletes are far more likely to go into business and Finance related jobs than their non-athlete classmates. In terms of advanced degrees, Ivy League athletes are more likely to get an MBA and to receive it from an elite program, although they are less likely to pursue an M.D., a Ph.D., or an advanced STEM degree. In terms of career outcomes, we find that Ivy League athletes outperform their non-athlete counterparts in the labor market. Athletes attain higher terminal wages and earn cumulatively more than non-athletes over the course of their careers controlling for school, graduation year, major, and first job. In addition, they attain more senior positions in the organizations they join. We also find that athletes from more socioeconomically diverse sports teams and from teams that have lower academic admissions thresholds have higher career outcomes than non-athletes. Collectively, our results suggest that non-academic human capital developed through athletic participation is valued in the labor market and may support the role that prior athletic achievement plays in admissions at elite colleges.

 

 

所有跟帖: 

I can reach any 社科 research conclusion you want if you pay -小豬的黃香蕉- 給 小豬的黃香蕉 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/20/2023 postreply 14:09:30

3.3% 屬於調研的誤差範圍內,別太當真了 -Wakeland- 給 Wakeland 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/20/2023 postreply 14:15:00

LOL -HappyWed- 給 HappyWed 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/20/2023 postreply 14:17:24

已經考慮過了,p 值是< 0.01 -mjnew- 給 mjnew 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/20/2023 postreply 14:21:34

為啥這麽多人說自己是理工科? -mjnew- 給 mjnew 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/20/2023 postreply 14:31:51

太自大了 lol -小豬的黃香蕉- 給 小豬的黃香蕉 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/20/2023 postreply 14:39:30

P值在sample size很大的時候可以很小,但是difference很小,不meaningful -luck_xin99- 給 luck_xin99 發送悄悄話 (55 bytes) () 10/20/2023 postreply 17:48:23

這種文章就是隨便搞個問卷調查,按人數算一下p值,不管是否隨機,是否和其他東西有correlation。完全是垃圾 -STEMkid- 給 STEMkid 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/20/2023 postreply 14:37:30

搞體育的逆商高,更成功不奇怪。 -biophysics- 給 biophysics 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/20/2023 postreply 14:50:00

身體好,多活兩年,3.3%就出來了 -小豬的黃香蕉- 給 小豬的黃香蕉 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/20/2023 postreply 14:52:16

搞職業體育的一般身體不好,很難長壽。不是說數學家最長壽? -兩女寶媽- 給 兩女寶媽 發送悄悄話 兩女寶媽 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 10/20/2023 postreply 15:26:37

藤校體育娃離職業體育還差幾個數量級,不用為他們操心。好多進去玩兩年就退出江湖做學霸去了 -moon*river- 給 moon*river 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/20/2023 postreply 15:43:35

科學家長壽的多,90多還在工作 -徽州老家- 給 徽州老家 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/20/2023 postreply 15:43:50

那也不能削足適履。不能一驚一乍的 -randomness- 給 randomness 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/20/2023 postreply 14:51:16

謝謝分享。有沒有考慮父母收入(關係)的提攜?有沒有體育娃和非體育娃的wealth和壽命的比較? -成功的兔- 給 成功的兔 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/20/2023 postreply 15:25:19

STEM牛蛙,MOP娃估計終身收入更高,壽命更長 -kevin2018- 給 kevin2018 發送悄悄話 (186 bytes) () 10/20/2023 postreply 15:48:31

華爾街壽命更長,老婆最多,僅次外科醫生 -avw- 給 avw 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/20/2023 postreply 17:04:01

這有啥不友好,ABC收入更高 -吹著吹著就牛了- 給 吹著吹著就牛了 發送悄悄話 吹著吹著就牛了 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 10/20/2023 postreply 17:57:52

為什麽說不友好呢?或者你有什麽事實反駁? -老糊塗2- 給 老糊塗2 發送悄悄話 老糊塗2 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 10/20/2023 postreply 18:12:20

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”