Yes, there is a special document called "point to point

response"--

the above document is just a cover letter (written to the editor).

Regarding the "不給referees麵子", this is a great question, actually

when one writes the point-to-point response, one should emphasize that this critism is a (great, most insightful, or extremly helpful, or other words ect.) in  the proper context. Yes, the authors should make the reviewers be happy ( make them feel-- hm, we are the most brilliant people in the world-- hahaha)