It is interesting we are reading a same report and concern on a similar question. This is also why I launch TalkTone to run an online polling project. If you are interested in this issue, I can find some papers for you.
From a journalist’s perspective, the current report is a bad qualified review, but raises a good question. In social psychology, there are some fundamental studies on information distortion and rumour spread. A classic study was from an Indian earthquake. The researchers found after an earthquake, more rumour or horrible news came from outsider than the earthquake resource. The degree f information distortion is highly correlated to the distance to the resource.
Regarding to China’s internet censorship, principally I accept censorship is necessary for a society, but it should be under the eye of law, not a dynamic policy or a leader’s arbitrary preference. We have not had a well-defined law and regulation to protect freedom of speech and information. The today problem is not rumour. The priory is a law to protect freedom of speech and information.
a reply to 媒體和言論自由能消除謊言嗎?中國網禁是否有其道理
所有跟帖:
•
媒體和言論自由能消除謊言嗎?NO!
-讚小田鼠-
♀
(384 bytes)
()
08/16/2010 postreply
07:12:52
•
回複:媒體和言論自由能消除謊言嗎?NO!
-talktone-
♂
(564 bytes)
()
08/16/2010 postreply
08:20:31
•
是沒有非白即黑...
-讚小田鼠-
♀
(488 bytes)
()
08/16/2010 postreply
09:32:38
•
五十步和一百步,往往是本質區別的。
-talktone-
♂
(162 bytes)
()
08/16/2010 postreply
10:21:05
•
中國是法治國家麽?為什麽不是?
-馭風而行-
♀
(18 bytes)
()
08/16/2010 postreply
07:42:15
•
在我看來,這不過是媒體人站在自己利益上的看法
-flywhc-
♂
(49 bytes)
()
08/16/2010 postreply
07:47:24
•
loll, you are cynical on politics
-talktone-
♂
(129 bytes)
()
08/16/2010 postreply
08:10:53
•
因為現在我代表百姓的心聲:呼喚三俗
-flywhc-
♂
(588 bytes)
()
08/16/2010 postreply
11:24:15
•
歡迎FLYWC先貼一些三俗的,讓我們先俗一把
-馬來人-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
08/16/2010 postreply
16:12:43