It is interesting we are reading a same report and concern on a similar question. This is also why I launch TalkTone to run an online polling project. If you are interested in this issue, I can find some papers for you.
From a journalist’s perspective, the current report is a bad qualified review, but raises a good question. In social psychology, there are some fundamental studies on information distortion and rumour spread. A classic study was from an Indian earthquake. The researchers found after an earthquake, more rumour or horrible news came from outsider than the earthquake resource. The degree f information distortion is highly correlated to the distance to the resource.
Regarding to China’s internet censorship, principally I accept censorship is necessary for a society, but it should be under the eye of law, not a dynamic policy or a leader’s arbitrary preference. We have not had a well-defined law and regulation to protect freedom of speech and information. The today problem is not rumour. The priory is a law to protect freedom of speech and information.
a reply to 媒體和言論自由能消除謊言嗎?中國網禁是否有其道理
所有跟帖:
• 媒體和言論自由能消除謊言嗎?NO! -讚小田鼠- ♀ (384 bytes) () 08/16/2010 postreply 07:12:52
• 回複:媒體和言論自由能消除謊言嗎?NO! -talktone- ♂ (564 bytes) () 08/16/2010 postreply 08:20:31
• 是沒有非白即黑... -讚小田鼠- ♀ (488 bytes) () 08/16/2010 postreply 09:32:38
• 五十步和一百步,往往是本質區別的。 -talktone- ♂ (162 bytes) () 08/16/2010 postreply 10:21:05
• 中國是法治國家麽?為什麽不是? -馭風而行- ♀ (18 bytes) () 08/16/2010 postreply 07:42:15
• 在我看來,這不過是媒體人站在自己利益上的看法 -flywhc- ♂ (49 bytes) () 08/16/2010 postreply 07:47:24
• loll, you are cynical on politics -talktone- ♂ (129 bytes) () 08/16/2010 postreply 08:10:53
• 因為現在我代表百姓的心聲:呼喚三俗 -flywhc- ♂ (588 bytes) () 08/16/2010 postreply 11:24:15
• 歡迎FLYWC先貼一些三俗的,讓我們先俗一把 -馬來人- ♂ (0 bytes) () 08/16/2010 postreply 16:12:43