巧婦為米是思維的問題沒有那個思維巧婦難為無米炊Stanford $5 thinking box:

來源: dhyang_wxc 於 2023-11-02 07:58:01

回答: 舊思維，新文化 由 stonebench 於 2023-11-01 12:15:24

是思維的問題。沒有那個思維，巧婦難為無米炊——熱氣哄哄，紅火熊熊，它沒米在裏麵，說什麽好？

張祥龍說的就是，整個思維被蔡閹割了。隻有極少數人能自己偶然、碰巧、奮力逃脫——然後被圍剿。

子曰，不可使知之。

巧婦難為無米, but she can think of wheat flour, meat (chicken, ducks, goose, cattles,

porks, lamp,), seafood, and fruits. Why stick with rice? She didn't think about her

purpose to feed the hunger. 

Purpose-driven life: Honor God and help people (HGHP). What is the endpoint

measurement? Never lose sight of the target.

 

That notion got me the below:

Stanford $5 thinking box:

The professor assigned $5 to each student to invest within 2 hours. The winner will be the one with the highest return. Guess how the winner was doing?

The winner:

only one student threw $5 (refused to think from the $5 angle); she thought outside the $5 box and went out saying to talk with companies - she would serve as a consultant and signed contracts with a few companies. She secured consulting contracts with down payments. This student's approach demonstrates resourcefulness and an ability to think creatively.

The losers: 

All the other students put $5 framework to rentals, to clean places, free service,...

conventional methods like renting and cleaning might have generated some income within the given time frame, but their returns might have been relatively modest. 

** ** 

Credits dued to The sources of my inspiration for the post above, are as follows.

dhyang_wxc發過的熱帖：

• 張祥龍：深層思想自由的消失－－新文化運動後果反思 （轉，節選）
• 柳子厚問舟
• 金庸及其他 （舊文）
• 愛情文學隨感
• 悖論：“言盡悖”
• 官話（古笑話改編）
• 老郎
• 一本1812年的小書（外一篇）
• 一個翻譯小技巧
• 《莊子》中的一個小數字問題

您的位置： 文學城 » 論壇 » 品茶小軒 » 是思維的問題。沒有那個思維，巧婦難為無米炊——熱氣哄哄，紅火熊熊，它沒米在裏麵，說什麽好？

所有跟帖： 

• 子曰，不可使知之。君臣父子，各歸其位，不可妄思！ -TJKCB-    (0 bytes) (2 reads) 11/02/2023 postreply 09:48:59

• 巧婦=米, why only rice? -TJKCB-    (448 bytes) (2 reads) 11/02/2023 postreply 09:57:01

 

• 舊思維，新文化 - stonebench -    (2191 bytes) (6504 reads) 11/01/2023  12:15:24 (5)

• 還是要思考這個大一統思維是否窒息民主和科學。 - Dayoufan -   (177 bytes) (11 reads) 11/01/2023  13:04:27

• 這個俺同意一半。新文化運動時確實需要考慮保留傳統會不會影響變革的速度。 - stonebench -    (125 bytes) (1 reads) 11/01/2023  20:18:38

• 在政治上，如果沒有向外獲利空間，開拓意識就必然內轉～～： 西方現有製度的成功很大程度是大航海以來以極低成本占有了大量資源 - 方外居士 -   (0 bytes) (4 reads) 11/01/2023  14:24:06

• 這使得外向開拓獲利而不是內卷成為可能。現在的西方仍然在收獲這個紅利，隻是方式變了。 - 方外居士 -   (0 bytes) (3 reads) 11/01/2023  14:27:46

• 今後這個製度能否繼續下去極大地取決於能否繼續獲得新的低成本資源。比如技術的進步讓以前的廢物變成寶貝。 - 方外居士 -   (0 bytes) (2 reads) 11/01/2023  15:11:19

• 完全同意。事實上西方崛起就是源於大航海後，發現並占領了殖民地。 - 為人父 -    (51 bytes) (3 reads) 11/01/2023  19:18:29

• 二元對立的思維=(賽先生開拓創收+ 德先生妥協機製後台分利) - TJKCB -    (846 bytes) (25 reads) 11/01/2023  15:05:05

• 有象斯有對，對必反其為，有反斯有仇，仇必和而解 - TJKCB -    (16333 bytes) (20 reads) 11/01/2023  15:23:04 (2)

• we must expand 德先生妥協機製後台分利Two wheels move along - TJKCB -    (432 bytes) (11 reads) 11/01/2023  15:25:13

• 中文很棒～～ - 盈盈一笑間 -    (0 bytes) (1 reads) 11/01/2023  17:49:26

• 莫非中文不是母語才特別讚中文棒？ - 方外居士 -   (0 bytes) (2 reads) 11/01/2023  18:57:52

• 好像是英文比中文好。 - 盈盈一笑間 -    (0 bytes) (1 reads) 11/01/2023  19:31:21

• 也有同感 - 方外居士 -   (0 bytes) (0 reads) 11/01/2023  20:16:16

• The clash betw/ individualism (West) and collectivism (East) - TJKCB -    (1848 bytes) (18 reads) 11/01/2023  15:37:59 (1)

• 此貼請轉美壇，展開討論。：） - 盈盈一笑間 -    (0 bytes) (2 reads) 11/01/2023  17:50:08

• 對德先生賽先生的新理解 - 盈盈一笑間 -    (0 bytes) (3 reads) 11/01/2023  17:49:03 (1)

• 很有這個原因。但我還是覺得是某種稟性的人才這麽想的。那麽關鍵問題是為什麽這部分人最終在中國勝出，而成為書寫歷史者。 - 中間小謝 -   (354 bytes) (23 reads) 11/01/2023  19:52:48 (1)

• 我相信是因為中國當時恰處於衰微之時，故我下麵說的"分流"之中，小智短見成了主流。如果同樣的歷史際遇出現在唐宋， - 中間小謝 -   (131 bytes) (11 reads) 11/01/2023  20:30:00 (1)

• “人才由於學術”。傳統學術能容許民國這些人的出現，這些人回過身，弄它個斷根，再無人才。。。。這是百年史。 - dhyang_wxc -    (0 bytes) (1 reads) 11/02/2023  08:04:46 (1)

• 楊振寧 梁漱溟 against 民主絕對主義/尺有所短，寸有所長/survival is measured - TJKCB -    (104 bytes) (1 reads) 11/02/2023  09:36:40

• 讚！緊扣內核，簡明意賅。也讚同前麵石教授客觀寬容地看待新文化運動之於中國社會大背景。-：） - 有言 -    (0 bytes) (2 reads) 11/01/2023  21:57:13 (1)

• 是思維的問題。沒有那個思維，巧婦難為無米炊——熱氣哄哄，紅火熊熊，它沒米在裏麵，說什麽好？ - dhyang_wxc -    (179 bytes) (7 reads) 11/02/2023  07:58:01 (1)

• 子曰，不可使知之。君臣父子，各歸其位，不可妄思！ - TJKCB -    (0 bytes) (2 reads) 11/02/2023  09:48:59

• 巧婦=米, why only rice? - TJKCB -    (448 bytes) (3 reads) 11/02/2023  09:57:01

所有跟帖： 

• 子曰，不可使知之。君臣父子，各歸其位，不可妄思！ -TJKCB-    (0 bytes) (2 reads) 11/02/2023 postreply 09:48:59

• 巧婦=米, why only rice? -TJKCB-    (448 bytes) (2 reads) 11/02/2023 postreply 09:57:01