Philosophical theories, he suggests, are attempts to answer questions that are not really questions at all (they are nonsense), or to solve problems that are not really problems. He says in proposition 4.003 that:
Most of the propositions and questions of philosophers arise from our failure to understand the logic of our language. (They belong to the same class as the question whether the good is more or less identical than the beautiful.) And it is not surprising that the deepest problems are in fact not problems at all.
雖然你懂的根本算不了哲學，但人家老維說的也不是你。人家說的是那些語言論以前的西方哲學。
而俺的帖子的主要目的，就是分析為啥老維也有局限。
跟泛泛而談的東西方思維沒有關係。你就不要小敏感了。
不服，就去論證老維錯了。
沒那個本事，就安安靜靜地待著。不要硬往你的主觀印象上扯。
